Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Press Shows Its Bias
TownHall.com ^ | 13 April 2005 | Linda Chavez

Posted on 04/13/2005 3:47:53 AM PDT by txradioguy

Tom DeLay is in a heap of trouble -- or so the media would have you believe. For weeks now, the front pages of the Washington Post and New York Times have hammered away at the House majority leader for a series of supposed transgressions. Some editorial staffer at the New York Times went so far as to try to persuade former Republican Congressman Bob Livingston to write an op-ed calling for DeLay to step aside for the good of the party, according to columnist Robert Novak. But what exactly is it that Tom DeLay is alleged to have done? After hundreds of hours of investigative work by the nation's biggest news organizations, the evidence of any actual ethical -- much less legal -- breach is pretty thin. Now contrast the media coverage of l'affaire DeLay with, say, the admission by former Clinton National Security Adviser Samuel "Sandy" Berger that he stole and destroyed classified documents that might have shed light on the Clinton administration's failure to take seriously the threat posed by al Qaeda. No wonder conservatives are a little paranoid about media bias.

Like many members of Congress and their staffs, DeLay has taken trips overseas paid for by third parties. Frankly, I think this is a lousy practice. If members or their staffs need information that can only be gleaned through traveling abroad, then the government should pick up the tab. My guess is there would be fewer trips, but so what? These trips have earned the term "junkets" for good reason. But DeLay is hardly the only member who has taken the largesse of groups trying to influence government.

The congressional ethics rules require these trips to be paid for by so-called 501(c)(3) groups, named for the tax code section that grants them exempt status. But it's silly to suggest that such groups aren't seeking influence (I should know, I've headed up several such organizations over the last 20 years). While they may not be lobbying Congress directly, such groups advocate public policy positions that can only be helped by close association with powerful senators and congressmen. Since money is fungible, it is often difficult to track whether such groups are really providing conduits for corporations or other prohibited groups to pay for the trips indirectly by making tax-deductible contributions to the policy group that then pays for the trip -- which is what the Post has tried to tar DeLay with.

In the most recent charge, the media have accused DeLay of going on a trip to Russia paid for by the National Center for Public Policy Research, which allegedly received donations second- or third-hand from Russian energy interests. So far, there's no proof that DeLay knew about, much less approved, these contributions. He might be guilty of keeping bad company -- lobbyist Jack Abramoff, currently under criminal investigation for some of his activities on behalf of Indian gaming interests, was on the Russia trip and may have ginned up the contributions that paid for it -- but at the time DeLay took the trip, he had no way of knowing how unsavory his companions were. The best way to prevent such abuse would be to prohibit any third party from paying for trips, period. But I don't see many Democrats advocating drastically changing the rules.

Which brings me to my second point. Why is it that the DeLay story has so dominated the media when the story of former Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy Berger's amazing guilty plea produced barely a footnote? The New York Times covered the story April 2 on page 10 with fewer than 600 words. And no one in the national media has seemed very interested in exploring why Berger stole and destroyed highly classified documents. "His motives in taking the documents remain something of a mystery," the usually inquisitive Times noted blandly. The Los Angeles Times (which at least put the story on page 1) ventured this guess as to why Berger took scissors to some copies of the stolen memos but not others: "Berger was notorious for having a desk that looked like it had been hit by a hurricane, and his defenders seemed to be suggesting he had held onto some copies and cut up others in order to avoid losing them." Yeah, right.

Could it be that maybe, just maybe, the hand-written notes in the margins of some documents might have made Berger or Bill Clinton look bad? You can bet if the documents had something to do with a trip by Tom DeLay, there would be 100 reporters assigned to find out.

Linda Chavez is President of the Center for Equal Opportunity, a Townhall.com member organization.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; mediabias; msm; republicans; tomdelay
Typical lefty ploy. No crime has been comitted so we'll use our "friends" in the MSM to fry him in the front pages of the NY Times.
1 posted on 04/13/2005 3:47:54 AM PDT by txradioguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

Maybe the GOP leadership should adopt a new strategery. Wheneve a Republican menber is asked a question about about Delay, he/she should respond.."I don't know, go ask Sandy Berger"


2 posted on 04/13/2005 3:52:17 AM PDT by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

LOL! That's the best idea I've heard of yet! I've got to write that down.


3 posted on 04/13/2005 3:55:09 AM PDT by txradioguy (Time and time again when you have a leftist backed into a corner they'll call you a Nazi-Neil Boortz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
In the most recent charge, the media have accused DeLay of going on a trip to Russia paid for by the National Center for Public Policy Research, which allegedly received donations second- or third-hand from Russian energy interests

Yes, the same media that never gave a rat's rear end about Clinton taking campaign money from the Chinese.

4 posted on 04/13/2005 4:06:01 AM PDT by libertylover (Being liberal means never being concerned about the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Or the H Clinton fundraiser that has been indicted in California.


5 posted on 04/13/2005 4:09:36 AM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
Yet another example of the MSM's "fake but accurate", with a twist of slime.
6 posted on 04/13/2005 4:14:19 AM PDT by benjaminjjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

Bump as ammo against Lefties


7 posted on 04/13/2005 4:31:49 AM PDT by Stormcrow ("It's not that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
. If members or their staffs need information that can only be gleaned through traveling abroad, then the government should pick up the tab. My guess is there would be fewer trips

My guess is there would be MORE trips.

New York Congressperson: "Yeah, its always freezing this time of the year in New York, so me, my friends, my mistress, my family, and my wife are all travelling down to the Carribean to study how they manage to keep that place warm all year round. I think this trip will be beneficial to all New Yorkers. We'll be back in about a month or two with our findings."

8 posted on 04/13/2005 4:44:03 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

One of the most disturbing parts of this column is the fact that our former National Security Advisor's desk looked like a hurricane hit it. Comforting image there . . . not!


9 posted on 04/13/2005 5:31:15 AM PDT by Galtoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
What's frustrating is that FReepers can come up with a
variety of good strategies to combat the DNC/MSM alliance,
but the GOP "leadership" can (or will) not.
10 posted on 04/13/2005 6:23:01 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

After the S&L scam, the Enron, WorldCom and Global Crossing fiascos I would expect a lot more coverage of the Fannie Mae theft and books juggling. Oh, I forgot, that was headed by Clinton cronies Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelick, et al. Nothing to see here. Let's move on.


11 posted on 04/13/2005 6:29:33 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

"I don't know, go ask Sandy Berger" Brilliant! Love it. Or, "Ask the Chief Pardoner."


12 posted on 04/13/2005 7:24:48 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci; backhoe

Rush is thinking about replacing the GOP leadership with ordinary conservatives:

"I have a message for the Republicans in Washington. If you want to be the minority Party we'll MAKE you the minority Party or run ordinary citizens against you. People that don't care what the MSM or Dems have to say. Get off your butts and start representating US!"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1382621/posts?page=3#3
Backhoe's link list of the Rush Rampage and DeLay fight


13 posted on 04/13/2005 7:27:38 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson