Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wis. Governor Rejects Cat-Hunting Idea
AP News via MYWAY.com ^ | Apr 13, 5:49 PM (ET) | BY RYAN J. FOLEY

Posted on 04/13/2005 7:22:56 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: WildBillArthur

Yep

Illegal to kill feral cats = Shoot, shovel, shut up


21 posted on 04/13/2005 8:16:34 PM PDT by hattend (Liberals! Beware the Perfect Rovian Storm [All Hail the Evil War Monkey King, Chimpus Khan!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

A liberal, but I think he was right on this.


AUTHOR: Adlai Ewing Stevenson (1900–65)
QUOTATION: I cannot agree that it should be the declared public policy of Illinois that a cat visiting a neighbor’s yard or crossing the highways is a public nuisance. It is in the nature of cats to do a certain amount of unescorted roaming. Many live with their owners in apartments or other restricted premises, and I doubt if we want to make their every brief foray an opportunity for a small game hunt by zealous citizens—with traps or otherwise. I am afraid this Bill could only create discord, recrimination and enmity. Also consider the owner’s dilemma: To escort a cat abroad on a leash is against the nature of the cat, and to permit it to venture forth for exercise unattended into a night of new dangers is against the nature of the owner. Moreover, cats perform useful service, particularly in rural areas, in combating rodents—work they necessarily perform alone and without regard for property lines.

We are all interested in protecting certain varieties of birds. That cats destroy some birds, I well know, but I believe this legislation would further but little the worthy cause to which its proponents give such unselfish effort. The problem of cat versus bird is as old as time. If we attempt to resolve it by legislation who knows but what we may be called upon to take sides as well in the age old problems of dog versus cat, bird versus bird, or even bird versus worm. In my opinion, the State of Illinois and its local governing bodies already have enough to do without trying to control feline delinquency.


22 posted on 04/13/2005 8:19:43 PM PDT by sittnick (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
I bet the free republic cat fanatics are thrilled about the endorsement from a fine, upstanding thinker like 'diamond' jim doyle.

Ideas aren't responsible for the people who hold them. I agree with Doyle on this issue, but I don't have to agree with him on anything else. Hitler was a vegetarian, but that doesn't make vegetarians Nazis, just like not wanting cats shot doesn't make me a kumbayah, tree-frenching, peecee-er.

23 posted on 04/13/2005 8:27:57 PM PDT by John Jorsett (email: mistersandiego yahoo.com (put the at sign in between those two))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Common sense doesn't apply to the cat fanatics. Just the love of their sweet, lovable mr. whiskers who could never hurt a fly.

You are the clueless one. This law is designed to prevent the killing of songbirds. Cats kill birds. They also kill mice. Eliminate mouse killing and increase disease. Brilliant policy enacted by cat haters. You are absoulutely brilliant.


24 posted on 04/13/2005 8:36:08 PM PDT by Cat loving Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

Ok, I am pretty sure this is not a liberal/conservative issue as much as a city/country issue.

I live in Mississippi in the woods on my 15 acres (little slice of redneck heaven.) I actually have a cat that is trying to take up here at that house and it sets off in the woods making this horrible noise all night for several nights now. I already have 4 dogs and 2 cats. I really dont care if it comes over and eats or not, but if he keeps me awake tonight, me and Mr. SKS might have to throw him a party. The same goes for a dog/fox killing my chickens or a dog that bites a human, a burglar in my house or yard or whatever else needs some killing. I dont really need permission.

The more I think about it, the more I disagree with hunting liscenses, while we're at it. Did the state put that deer on my land, bet not! Thats why I made the reference to Robin Hood, Men in tights. Just something to think about. :)

That being said, I probably wouldnt go cat hunting, unless I knew of a good taxidermist that could mount a 8 point rack on its head and make it look natural.


25 posted on 04/13/2005 8:40:13 PM PDT by WildBillArthur (USMC Reserve, USNA '99, Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
"I bet the free republic cat fanatics are thrilled about the endorsement from a fine, upstanding thinker like 'diamond' jim doyle."

I'm not a cat fanatic, never owned one never will (I'm a dog lover and a hunter).

And you're right about Jim Doyle. The guy is a left-wing extremist who only holds office because of Dane County and the Milwaukee metropolitan area. In other words, a socialist.

There's only one problem here; Doyle called this one correctly, and I'll tell you why. It isn't because he understands the issue, he just got lucky (even a blind chicken finds a kernal of corn from time to time).

The problem I have with this hunt is the opportunity it will afford animal rights wacko's and anti-hunters such as PETA to press their attack on hunting. The adverse PR which will be attached to hunters will be devestating, and PETA knows it. Doyle apparently didn't see that angle, being the goof that he is. That could change.

In the meantime, I strongly urge all legitimate Wisconsin sportsmen to NOT participate in this hunt, if the bill passes. Out-of-control domestic animals are the responsibility of local animal control, not hunters.

26 posted on 04/13/2005 8:56:35 PM PDT by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Another case of imposing suburban and urban values on rural residents, for whom feral animals are a legitimate problem - But "Bingo" Doyle knows that rural residents won't vote for him, so he doesn't care.


27 posted on 04/13/2005 8:59:47 PM PDT by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA
"Rush has lost his mind over this. Said it was a slippery slope. Next people will be breaking in and killing your canary. I kid you not."

Rush was right. And I'm not a cat lover.

28 posted on 04/13/2005 9:00:51 PM PDT by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"Hitler was a vegetarian, but that doesn't make vegetarians Nazis, ..."

Actually, every vegetarian I've ever met was a perfect Nazi, telling me not to do this, not to do that, interfering in my life with the vigor of Heinrich Himmler. I'd not be surprised if down the road, meat-eaters would be compelled to wear a star of David with a T-bone image on it.

29 posted on 04/13/2005 9:07:04 PM PDT by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

"You are the clueless one. This law is designed to prevent the killing of songbirds. Cats kill birds. They also kill mice. Eliminate mouse killing and increase disease. Brilliant policy enacted by cat haters. You are absoulutely brilliant."

I guess the entire US military is run by a bunch of cat haters:

http://www.afpmb.org/pubs/tims/tim37.htm

REASONS FOR FERAL/STRAY (henceforth referred to as feral) CAT CONTROL

1. Feral cats are animals that are no longer under human control, but live and reproduce in the wild, usually in close association with humans. Humans have neglected these animals, which live exposed to disease, hunger, weather and attack from dogs, humans or other cats and animals. Some of these cats may survive for several years before succumbing to starvation, disease, dogs, other animals or motor vehicles. Failure to prevent or control a feral cat population amounts to inhumane treatment of animals.

2. Feral cats can harbor and transmit a variety of fatal and non-fatal diseases to domestic cats and other pets. These diseases include rabies, plague, parasitic worms, external parasites such as fleas and mites, feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), feline leukemia virus (FeLV), feline distemper or panleukopenia, feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), and various bacterial infections.

3. Feral cats can also harbor and transmit fatal and non-fatal diseases to humans. These include rabies, plague, ringworm, internal and external parasites, toxoplasmosis, bartonellosis (formerly known as cat scratch fever), allergies to cat hair, and secondary bacterial infections from cat scratches and bites.

4. Feral cats living in close association with humans can also damage buildings, contaminate food supplies, and kill birds and other wildlife. Parasites such as fleas are often a problem in areas inhabited by feral cats.

Gee, guess I have the army on my side. What do you have, peta???


30 posted on 04/13/2005 9:07:15 PM PDT by flashbunny (Any discussion involving cats apparently requires the abandonment of logic by cat lovers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: yooper

"The problem I have with this hunt is the opportunity it will afford animal rights wacko's and anti-hunters such as PETA to press their attack on hunting. The adverse PR which will be attached to hunters will be devestating, and PETA knows it. Doyle apparently didn't see that angle, being the goof that he is. That could change."

sorry, that's silly. I've seen other people put forth the same argument, but it doesn't make it any less silly.

Many other states have the same law they are seeking in wisconsin. Does that hurt other forms of hunting in states like minnesota? No, it doesn't. It just allows them to get rid of feral cats that kill millions of animals that belong in the wild.

I guess the best thing is how these threads have illustrated how psychotic people can become when they think it involves their pets. And also how many conservatives (even people like rush) are willing to check their brains at the door and throw logic out the window when it comes to cats.


31 posted on 04/13/2005 9:10:04 PM PDT by flashbunny (Any discussion involving cats apparently requires the abandonment of logic by cat lovers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
No, it just makes you a person who has abandoned fact and logic on this issue.

With every other nuisance animal, the remedy is to let land owners and hunters help deal with the problem.

I posted in another thread about the Nutria problem. They were imported into the US for the fur market. After the market dried up, they were released into the wild. They had no natural predators, so their population exploded. A lot of damage has been caused by them and the damage continues to this day.

Guess what? The state of LA issued a bounty for every dead nutria. Nobody here would ever cry over a dead nutria (except petaphiles). But extrapolate the same situation to FERAL cats. Instead of treating them like the FERAL animals they are - destructive and harmful because of the diseases they carry - people completely freak out and think anybody who proposes to deal with them in the same way we deal with every other feral animal are bloodthirsty murderers. Look at the other threads. They call people every name in the book, call them rednecks, and even threaten to hurt or even kill people who realize these PESTS need to be dealt with.

That is insane. And these people either don't realize or don't care how unbalanced and illogical they look. And not for one damn second can they separate these FERAL cats from their beloved housecats.
32 posted on 04/13/2005 9:17:41 PM PDT by flashbunny (Any discussion involving cats apparently requires the abandonment of logic by cat lovers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lx

Keep trying, you're almost witty. Almost.


33 posted on 04/13/2005 9:20:42 PM PDT by flashbunny (Any discussion involving cats apparently requires the abandonment of logic by cat lovers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

I was serious; you really need some sort of help. I see this as a scream for help.

I know you like to project the image of a tough guy and attacking cats is truly a manly pursuit but maybe if you get in touch with your inner child you can accept your problems with your latent urges and accept that you're 'different'. We stand behind you all the way.


34 posted on 04/13/2005 9:40:04 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: hattend

That's EXACTLY right. Heck, I never even knew it WASN'T legal.


35 posted on 04/13/2005 9:51:20 PM PDT by AggieCPA (Howdy, Ags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lx

"I know you like to project the image of a tough guy and attacking cats is truly a manly pursuit but maybe if you get in touch with your inner child you can accept your problems with your latent urges and accept that you're 'different'. We stand behind you all the way."

Um, thanks for project your insecurities. But instead you just project the sad,pathetic nature of the cat fanatics for all to see.

It has nothing to do with 'tough guy' this or 'redneck' that. It has to do with using the brain God gave you instead of emoting like a little child.

You are so simple minded you can not distinguish between your house cat and a feral cat that is damaging to the environment. Luckily, most states do. As well as the US armed forces, that has its own Feral Cat policy that includes killing the efficient little killing machines.

Forty million feral cats in the wild. Killing at least 2 birds a week. Fifty two weeks a year. And not only killing for food, killing for pleasure. If you want to talk about 'tough guys', feral cats are the the original 'tough guys'. They kill animals for no reason, and they torment their prey before finally taking their life. You need a freaking clue, pal.


36 posted on 04/13/2005 9:51:32 PM PDT by flashbunny (Any discussion involving cats apparently requires the abandonment of logic by cat lovers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AggieCPA

killing cats is legal in many states. Heck, the US armed forces feral cat policy even includes killing them.

Unfortunately, WI is behind the times and runs by emotion instead of facts.


37 posted on 04/13/2005 9:52:42 PM PDT by flashbunny (Any discussion involving cats apparently requires the abandonment of logic by cat lovers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sittnick

Yeah? Well if the cats he waxes poetically about come into MY yard, I assure you they will "mysteriously" disappear.

Apparently in some people's minds cats have more rights than people.


38 posted on 04/13/2005 9:53:12 PM PDT by AggieCPA (Howdy, Ags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

You're right. The feral cats around here kill birds all the time. Even though people leave cat food out 24/7. It's really gross.


39 posted on 04/13/2005 10:07:12 PM PDT by Sabatier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sabatier

Have you all seen "Pinky the Cat???"

http://gprime.net/video.php/pinkythecat

...btw...i have two INDOOR cats I dearly love...but I can understand the fears of those (especially in the suburbs and rural areas) that let their cats roam....


40 posted on 04/13/2005 10:21:32 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson