Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair pledges full support for EU Constitution
Euobserver ^ | 13.04.2005 | Lucia Kubosova

Posted on 04/15/2005 10:14:34 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - The British Labour party's manifesto has promised a "wholehearted" campaign in favour of the EU Constitution, with media suggesting that all members of a future Labour government must support the new treaty in the run up to the referendum.

Labour unveiled its key election document on Wednesday (13 April), days ahead of the poll scheduled for 5 May.

The manifesto hails the benefits of Britain's EU membership, while pointing out that the UK has moved from, "marginal players, often ignored, to leaders in the European Union", as a result of the Labour government´s policies since 1997.

The document argues the new constitution, "sets out what the EU can do and what it cannot," and it is therefore, "a good treaty for Britain and for the new Europe."

"We will put it to the British people in a referendum and campaign whole-heartedly for a 'Yes' vote to keep Britain a leading nation in Europe," the manifesto states.

Muzzled ministers

Some UK media have suggested there is disagreement within the party on whether or not all ministers would still be bound to support the constitution after the general elections.

Under the proposal, even lower ranking ministers would risk being sacked if they express the wrong view during the pre-referendum campaign.

Some Labour figures have criticised the move, referring to the 1975 referendum reaffirming Britain's EU membership under Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson, who allowed ministers to vote freely.

Mr Gary Titley (PSE), the leader of British Labour party MEPs remarked, "there is nothing wrong with the proposal, as the constitution will first have to get through parliament, so those who oppose it can express their opinion there".

"However, once it gets approved and put to people in a referendum, the government should fully stand by it, as is common in other countries," he told EUobserver.

Mr Titley added that Labour's EU policy would not change if the party won a third consecutive victory.

"We would remain involved with Europe, trying hard to make it work better and more effectively," he indicated.

Yes, but - to the Euro, as usual

The Labour manifesto also states its government would, "bring closer EU membership for Turkey, the Balkans and Eastern Europe", and work to build stronger EU defence capabilities in harmony with NATO.

Concerning the euro, Labour suggested it would keep its, "common-sense policy", referring to the five economic tests that must be met before any decision to join can be made.

Should the tests be met, the Government would put it to a vote in parliament and hold a national referendum.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: constitution; election; eu; euconstitution; europeanunion; treason; uk

1 posted on 04/15/2005 10:14:35 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Yes, Blair supprted the US over Iraq, but he is a threat to the independence of the UK.


2 posted on 04/15/2005 10:17:03 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Keep Britain a leading nation in Europe?

Wrong. With the EU Constitution, British sovereignty wil virtually disappear. And the US will lose a wonderful ally because Brussels would regulate British foreign policy.

Britain, Say NO to the European Constitution. Vote for the Conservative Party.


3 posted on 04/15/2005 10:17:38 AM PDT by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Surprising that on something as important as this, Labor makes it a party-line vote..


4 posted on 04/15/2005 10:19:32 AM PDT by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Not surprising at all. In my opinion Blair's understanding of democracy is no more than skin deep...

(OK, flame away!)


5 posted on 04/15/2005 10:22:03 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

The equivalent would be the US congressional leadership insisting on a party-line vote for a declaration of war...


6 posted on 04/15/2005 10:28:44 AM PDT by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
I still think it was the Royals and the old line British establishment that pushed Blair over whatever scruples he had in backing us.

One must remember one thing: Without the "special relationship," and the ability - real or imagined - to "intermediate" with the US - Blair really has no leverage at all in dealing with the other larger nations of the "Old Europe" nations of the EU and their various minions. This would be true of any PM of the UK, but it is particularly true of Blair given that he too is of the left. Much of what the UK takes to the table in the EU is based on its relations with the USA, and this is true in both the official and the private realms

Yes, Kudos to Blair for supporting us in our hour of need, and, yes, there was true loyalty, honor and even courage in the mix, but there as well were pragmatic reasons behind his support. We should never forget that Blair is a socialist and that labor's policies are a complete disaster, nor forget that Labor, like all of the left, sharpen their knives for the killing blow on our mutual civilization and culture.

One also should realize that it would not be inkeeping with the British character to abandon the USA in its hour of need given all that has transpired between our two nations in the last century. Whatever faults the Brits may possess, disloyalty, cowardice, ingratitude and dishonorableness are not among them.

We, of course, cannot rely one this forever - perhaps never again, given all the agitprop the leftist's have put out - but the at the time he stood by us it would seem unimaginable that the British people would have not stood by us.

Perhaps when all of this has passed, when Bush has been proved right by history, we can again expect unwavering support from the UK, but we should not forget what dark forces are gathering on the left in the EU and the UK. Much of Blair's program is violently against almost every hope, value, morality, and institution that we cherish here on FR.

Blair is a complicated figure in that he is not an atheist and seems to honestly believe in his program. Still, his trajectory will lead the UK towards perdition. As that wise once said, that road is paved with good intentions.

7 posted on 04/15/2005 10:48:05 AM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

So at what point is the EU required to give up it's multiple seats at the UN and similar international organizations?


8 posted on 04/15/2005 11:08:02 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
Yes, Blair supprted the US over Iraq, but he is a threat to the independence of the UK.

In my best Parliament voice:
Here Here!

9 posted on 04/15/2005 11:32:36 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
I still think it was the Royals and the old line British establishment that pushed Blair over whatever scruples he had in backing us

That line is totally wrong I'm afraid. The Royals have no power or influence whatsoever, and Blair is the establishment.

10 posted on 04/15/2005 11:39:04 AM PDT by cooper72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Americans should watch this very closely because if the FTAA goes through as planned we'll also see calls for a new "American Union" constitution which if passed could have severe ramifications on our rights and legal system.


11 posted on 04/15/2005 11:43:28 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cooper72
Well that is not in line with my experience. It is behind the scenes and more in the private and semi public sector, but the Royals and the old line establishment still have quite a bit of influence. Not in a direct political way, but indirectly. The UK is one of our largest investors; The USA is one of the largest investors in the UK. I particularly see the influence in the City and on Wall St.

So I respectfully disagree.

12 posted on 04/15/2005 1:15:35 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist

It would be interesting if you could give me an example of the Royals influencing anything?


13 posted on 04/16/2005 6:19:51 AM PDT by cooper72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson