Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoothing is for Wusses
Wall Street Journal ^ | April 15, 2005 | Andy Kessler

Posted on 04/15/2005 10:54:45 AM PDT by AZLiberty

The big financial stories this week are perfectly related. In order to smooth AIG’s reported earnings, Hank Greenberg entered into a questionable swap with Warren Buffet. It kept his stock up then, but now that investors have figured it out, his stock has gone from $70 to $50 and he has joined the unemployed. He should have let his stock trade wildly.

Fifteen NYSE Specialists were indicted this week for trading ahead of customers. Because of rules dating back to 1975 (the trade-through rule) Specialists have a virtual monopoly in the trading of listed stocks, but only if they abide by Rule 104: “No specialist shall effect on the Exchange purchases or sales of any security … unless such dealings are reasonably necessary to permit such specialist to maintain a fair and orderly market.” In other words, smooth out the trading of shares. But who wants their markets orderly? I like them wet and wild, thank you. It shakes out the weak of heart. Smoothing has its costs. In effect, according to the SEC enforcement division, Specialists have a license to steal.

Rather than spend money to retool when times were good, Ford (joining GM) skated with ugly, underpowered cars that only rental car companies bought. Now earnings have disappeared and the stock has halved in the last year. Smoothing caught up with Detroit; they should have taken their lumps years ago.

Ever wonder why, when a company misses its earnings target by a mere penny (like eBay in January), its stock drops like a rock? Because investors know there’s no more ammo left to smooth with. If they couldn’t smooth that last penny, it’s all over.

So many in charge think they need to shield us from ups and downs. Alan Greenspan cuts rates and floods the market with dollars in order to stave off a recession and get the dollar lower to appease manufacturers. We got few new jobs, but, instead, an overheated housing market so these new workers are renters.

A quick, deeper recession might have been useful for changes, like forcing bloated airlines into the hands of new management. Instead they bleed to death, drip-drip-drip. Manufacturers lose out to cheap imports and instead of finding some new business to get into, hire lobbyists to put 27% duties on Chinese products.

Americans are sturdy; why emulate European stability? We stand with whiny kids in 45-minute lines to ride on two-minute rollercoasters. We like volatility—give it to us.

Yet we’re a society of safety nets to smooth our lives. Corporate pensions save for our retirements, the PBGC insures their solvency and Social Security backs them both up. Thank goodness Ken Lay isn’t Japanese or Enron would still be alive.

Recessions clean up past business mistakes. Crises force legislators to cast politically difficult votes. Low stocks remove access to capital from questionable companies. All good. At the end of the day, smoothing is for wusses.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: aig; economics; kessler
I just discovered Andy Kessler this past week. I enjoy his articles, which are mainly at the intersection of technology and economics. You can find more, at his Web site, including a nice take on the supposed trade deficit, We Think, They Sweat, and a free PDF book on the history of technology, called How We Got Here: A Slightly Irreverent History of Technology and Markets.
1 posted on 04/15/2005 10:54:47 AM PDT by AZLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

Overall, I agree with him. Good post.


2 posted on 04/15/2005 10:56:49 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

Very good post. If you have any questions about what happens with 'smoothing' just look at what happened to MG Rover. It's costing the Brits millions of pounds just to give all the folks being put out of work (roughly 5K) one week's severance pay - at taxpayer expense.

Good businesses prosper; bad businesses fail and go under. Period. Why do we continue to bail out bloated, overpaid, underservicing airlines, when Southwest's profits TRIPLED last year? Let the underperformers fail; someone else will take their place.


3 posted on 04/15/2005 11:16:42 AM PDT by tgusa (USN A-6 pilot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgusa
Good businesses prosper; bad businesses fail and go under.

Yep, but we don't need the government to induce or prolong recessions to make it happen.

4 posted on 04/15/2005 11:36:20 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

Interesting! Thanks!


5 posted on 04/15/2005 11:39:09 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson