To: Max in Utah
It's the one I'm against. It should be called "constructionist" because under our constitution, and those constitutions of our original states, it didn't ever exist. People's nearly unanimous values made us Christian. Then we encouraged a lot of non-Christian immigration, and we imported a lot of non-Christian philosophy from Asia and France. Guess what happened? We lost our unanimity. Out of one became many. This has been unfortunate, and I say that we should base our policies intelligently on admitting that we've made a mistake with our last 100 years of immigration, and our federally supported educational system that preaches Marxism and post modernism/post structuralism.
These are things that Tailgunner Joe seems reluctant to address, and yet to me they are far more critical than a slab of concrete in Roy Moore's courthouse.
20 posted on
04/15/2005 5:51:14 PM PDT by
risk
To: risk
Aren't those the same people who reject the constitution because it's "Godless," just like the ACLU says?
That is the diametrical opposite of the beliefs of we who champion this great Union's Christian Heritage.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson