To: Huck
I'm sure it'll be fair and balanced.
You're on to something there. Think about it. How many of us haven't picked up a Time magazine in years. I'll buy it just to read the article about her. If they do actually manage to write a fair story about her, it might encourage some of us to subscribe. (Not FReepers, of course, because we know what they're up to.)
22 posted on
04/17/2005 4:25:56 AM PDT by
wolfpat
(Dum vivimus, vivamus)
To: wolfpat
"I'll buy it just to read the article about her."
You might see if it's on line first or you can also get it at the library. Don't forget this is Time-Warner a media enemy if a media enemy there ever was.
41 posted on
04/17/2005 4:50:02 AM PDT by
bilhosty
To: wolfpat
I guess I've picked up either Time or Newsweek in the gym once or twice. I can't tell them apart.
65 posted on
04/17/2005 5:25:34 AM PDT by
Huck
(One day the lion will lay down with the lamb; Until that day comes, I want America to be the lion.)
To: wolfpat
You mean Time has subscribers? I thought they were strictly a doctor's office thing.
138 posted on
04/17/2005 9:34:10 AM PDT by
AmishDude
(Join the AmishDude fan club: "You're so right, AmishDude" -- beyond the sea)
To: wolfpat
"You're on to something there. Think about it. How many of us haven't picked up a Time magazine in years. I'll buy it just to read the article about her."
The LSM might finally be realizing that in order to sell paper and make money they need the other 60% of people in this country.
225 posted on
04/17/2005 5:07:12 PM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(60 votes and the world changes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson