Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snowsislander
Re #38

That is why Bush and his crew bring fight right into the Chinese heartland, by adopting freedom offensive. Galvanizing Chinese people against their regime is more powerful than carrier battle group. If necessary, we should be able to fight ideological offensive as our adversaries(communists) used to do.

39 posted on 04/17/2005 10:08:06 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster
That is why Bush and his crew bring fight right into the Chinese heartland, by adopting freedom offensive. Galvanizing Chinese people against their regime is more powerful than carrier battle group. If necessary, we should be able to fight ideological offensive as our adversaries(communists) used to do.

If President Bush succeeds at that, then I seriously think he will be acclaimed as perhaps our greatest president in terms of foreign policy. Even President Reagan only took on an economically moribund USSR, and whatever else China might be, it certainly is not moribund economically.

As it is, he is doing a fine job of leaving himself a legacy that we can be very proud of in foreign policy.

40 posted on 04/17/2005 10:16:10 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

That was the beauty of Reagan's approach. Without a shot (most of the time).


42 posted on 04/17/2005 1:47:14 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson