Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Capriole
The main thing I would disagree with in your long "analysis" is that in point # 1 I think Ann would have no problem whatsoever looking great and sexy since she knows she is anything but the dumb blond type. Besides that I don't know any conservative women that have a problem looking good or sexy. Many are just that.
40 posted on 04/18/2005 4:22:07 PM PDT by rodguy911 (rodguy911:First Let's get rid of the UN and the ACLU,..toss in CAIR as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: rodguy911
The main thing I would disagree with in your long "analysis" is that in point # 1 I think Ann would have no problem whatsoever looking great and sexy since she knows she is anything but the dumb blond type. Besides that I don't know any conservative women that have a problem looking good or sexy. Many are just that.

We are not in disagreement. I'm just saying that most women who are not actresses would not really want to appear on the cover of Time magazine looking sexy. They'd want to look attractive but also intelligent, astute, or whatever. Sexy is for other situations. Ann doesn't really look sexual here but then would she really want to? Instead she looks pretty, youthful, and smart, which she is.

68 posted on 04/18/2005 5:56:43 PM PDT by Capriole (I don't have any problems that couldn't be solved by more chocolate or more ammunition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson