Posted on 04/19/2005 8:37:21 PM PDT by kingattax
We'll see. Like I said, hope you're right...
Post #2 for Delay info.
Tom DeLay Rocks!!!!
Thanks for Posting. I'm proud of Delay.
I hope he continues to stand firm.
i have great respect for Cong. DeLay. please see # 2.
we all need to write him an email of support.
Gore vs Bush comes to mind as an important one.
Why? Because you disagree with the dissenting opinions? (Which, by the way, argued in effect that the majority decision was an impermissible over-extension of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and improper judicial activism, both of which are the principal complaints lodged against the Court by many posters here.)
He makes my skin crawl when I listen to him. He comes across as wound up so tight, and so angry, that I sometimes wonder if he might go postal. I think he frightens swing voters, and sends them running to the exits. And he does not mitigate that by articulating or selling well his policy positions. In fact, he hardly bothers. His speech on the Schiavo legislation was a case in point. He just said, the Schindlers want to take care of their daughter who is dying. Let's call the vote.
I think the DeLay issue might cost the GOP a half dozen seats in the House or more, all by himself, if matters remain as they are now. Actually, there is a fair chance that DeLay will lose is own seat, if a credible and well financed Dem runs against him. He won only 55% last time against an unfunded nobody, which was a rather anemic performance for the district.
see # 2 .......thanks
Thank you! I was wanting to send him an e-mail to thank him and to give him encouragement, but I didn't have his addy. Now I do, so I'm sending one out today.
thats great...youre welcome
But, one might ask how reliable these sites are. They know the tons of law books on their shelves can be counted on to have been proofread with a fine tooth comb -- the publisher's reputation rests on it. Nobody's attesting to the accuracy of what you can Google up.
No, not at all--because it shows their political stripe is more important than law. The case went to the federal guidelines of voting and whether it was correct to re-count only certain counties (democrat) and on the face of it, it is only pandering to the left, not substantiated by law. These judges consistently err on the side of the left and only in rare instances do they agree with strict construction. Whether the issue is parental notification, privacy, private ownership, criminal law, police procedures, jerrymandering, I have an opinion on where they go based on their socialist lite, sometimes heavy decisions.
He could take Kay Bailey's place. Then Texas would have Cornyn and DeLay - WOW!
Well, I agree that Souter and Ginsberg have a decidedly liberal slant in their decisions. But the majority decision in Bush v. Gore had nothing to do with "strict construction," and was an extraordinary act of judicial activism (although the kind of activism that we, as conservatives, apparently approve of).
There is no more telling evidence of just how activist the decision was than the mandate language that it is not to be considered precedential for any purpose.
Well, Lexis and Westlaw are on the Internet.
Yep and vulnerable like everything else on the Internet!
A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE? Would YOU want YOUR loved one's LIFE, to be LITERALLY subject to the SUPREME COURT deciding on info from the Internet and INTERNATIONAL LAW, as oppose to AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW?
NOT ME!
WTF??
I have no idea what he's even trying to say, unless it's a cynical play to the clueless peanut gallery crowd who think that "The Internet" is all about porn and bootlegging.
It's as if you accused Justice Kennedy of "doing his research by reading" to an audience that doesn't understand the difference between Blackstone and the authors of the Weekly World News.
Are you suggesting that the data bases maintained by biologists, physicists, mathematicians, engineers, oil and gas e&p companies, economic think tanks, etc. cannot be relied upon by the professionals in those fields?
Even the casual user can distinguish between a legitimate database and World Net Daily (as I hope you can), and a Supreme Court Justice isn't exactly a casual user.
Are you suggesting that the data bases maintained by biologists, physicists, mathematicians, engineers, oil and gas e&p companies, economic think tanks, etc. cannot be relied upon by the professionals in those fields?
Even the casual user can distinguish between a legitimate database and World Net Daily (as I hope you can), and a Supreme Court Justice isn't exactly a casual user.
ummm.....HELLO? A computerized database, is not the SAME as the INTERNET! One does not need to access the Internet, to access one's DATABASE!
That is DIFFERENT! But that isn't what Kennedy utilized! Oh and why the avoidance in his use of seeking INTERNATIONAL LAW to support his CRIME?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.