Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry

"...and scientists speculate..."
---
"The researchers think..."
---
"This new theory..."
---
"It is thought..."
---
"...still not fully understood by scientists..."
---
"Therefore, they speculate,..."
---
"...if it stands further scrutiny."

All this is is speculative guesswork. Yawn.


8 posted on 04/20/2005 5:42:09 PM PDT by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Stark_GOP
speculative guesswork

I guess you think all science then is speculative guesswork?

With what can we contrast this? ID or creation science? My guess is that many adherents to these beliefs would not have any questions or doubts about them, and would not be trying to disprove (falsify) them. And that is precisely why they are not science.

When creationists try to destroy the credibility of evolution, they undercut the entire credibility of science in the minds of many people. No wonder the junk science used by the extreme environmentalists is so widely accepted.

Better leave science to the scientists.

11 posted on 04/20/2005 5:51:42 PM PDT by Coyoteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Stark_GOP

Bingo! Evolution is a THEORY. You could give all of your belief system to evolution but it is by definition a THEORY. Creationism is also by definition, scientifically, a THEORY. ID is also by definition, scientifically, a THEORY. All three require a degree of FAITH so hence all are FAITH-BASED.

The comfortable assumptions made in this article, as you so astutely observed, are the building blocks of a THEORY.

Well at least that's my THEORY.

Now leave me alone while I try to figure out how to scientifically make something out of nothing (it will be a while.)


37 posted on 04/20/2005 7:10:51 PM PDT by torchthemummy ("Sober Idealism Equals Pragmatism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Stark_GOP

Yes, all the weasel words by evolutions are there.

They are desperately trying to avoid the OBVIOUS -

variation with in a species!

Nothing new about that!


44 posted on 04/20/2005 7:45:31 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Stark_GOP
"All this is is speculative guesswork. Yawn.

Which is a whole lot more responsible than ignorant certainty. BTW, never assume that what the scientist said is reflected accurately in what the reporter writes.

56 posted on 04/21/2005 2:31:29 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
7 posts before the hijack.

FR needs a Science Forum.

58 posted on 04/21/2005 5:02:20 AM PDT by ASA Vet (The speed of time is one second per second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Stark_GOP; PatrickHenry
"This new research could help explain..."

"...says the research is very interesting -- if it stands further scrutiny. "

"But it still doesn't explain the initial step..."

Give us money. See how interesting this research is? Give us money. It's interesting because we repeatedly told you it was interesting. Give us money. See how useful this research is? Give us money. It might do this...it might do that.... Give us money

69 posted on 04/21/2005 6:44:24 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Stark_GOP
"...and scientists speculate..."
---
"The researchers think..."
---
"This new theory..."
---
"It is thought..."
---
"...still not fully understood by scientists..."
---
"Therefore, they speculate,..."
---
"...if it stands further scrutiny."

All this is is speculative guesswork. Yawn.

Meanwhile, in a parallel universe, your parallel self (the one with the beard) posted this...

"...and scientists assert..."
---
"The researchers know..."
---
"This new fact..."
---
"It is known..."
---
"...fully understood by scientists..."
---
"Therefore, they insist,..."
---
"...it WILL withstand further scrutiny."

All this is is arrogant dogmatism. Yawn.


109 posted on 04/21/2005 12:58:01 PM PDT by jennyp (WHAT I'M LISTENING TO: The voices in my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson