Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quidnunc
Gore ran a campaign sufficiently erratic in 2000, despite the kind of peace and prosperity thought to benefit incumbents, that he lost the White House by a split decision in the Supreme Court.

I know it is like fighting the tide, but I must point out that Al Gore lost because he got fewer votes in Florida. There is not way, under any counting scheme proposed, he would have won in Florida. The 2000 election was not decided by the Supreme Court. Anybody who says so is revealing himself to be an idiot.

6 posted on 04/21/2005 10:52:52 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock
The 2000 election was not decided by the Supreme Court. Anybody who says so is revealing himself to be an idiot.

There was practically no mechanism by which Al Gore would have become President in 2000, Supreme Court or no Supreme Court. Something like 11 of the 12 media recount scenarios showed Bush winning Florida. And even if the 1-in-12 Gore longshot came to pass, or the Florida Supreme Court did something stupid (again), the Republicans controlled the Governor's mansion and the state legislature. Worst case scenario, the Florida GOP sends up a competing slate of Bush electors to DC. And the GOP had the votes in the House to validate the GOP slate. Gore loses no matter what.

16 posted on 04/21/2005 11:01:10 AM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson