Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traderrob6

It didn't say oral sex, did it?


13 posted on 04/22/2005 3:41:00 PM PDT by null and void (You're in Bloody Hands with Allah State...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: null and void; traderrob6

It didn't specify the type of sodomy but it was the escapades of Kaiser Willie that made "oral sex isn't really sex" part of the modern culture.


15 posted on 04/22/2005 3:44:08 PM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

they brought lotion.
it wasn't ORAL.


17 posted on 04/22/2005 3:46:18 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

The law see both anal and oral as sodomy, but this article seems to imply anal.


26 posted on 04/22/2005 3:52:31 PM PDT by newsgatherer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

no but the reference was to the fact that teenagers at age 14, sometimes younger are having oral sex because they don't consider it sex, I have a very social nephew at that age and you ask him and he blushes.....my sister in law say they also hang out in groups, the parents think that is great but in fact they are having casual sex with each other, no biggie....


52 posted on 04/22/2005 4:16:32 PM PDT by littlelilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson