Posted on 04/23/2005 8:35:22 AM PDT by kristinn
The American flag was appropriated by the political right wing years ago. Now the Christian right is trying to hijack religion. This time it shouldn't be allowed to happen without a fight.
In 1969...SNIP...The flag had been taken over by self-styled patriots, noncombatant domestic supporters of the war and vocal opponents of the civil rights movement. Nixonites and George Wallace supporters were sporting flags in their lapels and stickers on their cars.
SNIP
It didn't help that some Vietnam War protesters stupidly burned the American flag.
SNIP
Emboldened by their appropriation of the flag, ideologues on the right have now set their sights on religion, and specifically Christianity, as the means to promote their political agenda. And as the promoters of tomorrow's "Justice Sunday" national telecast have demonstrated, there is no depth to which they won't sink in their campaign to seize the country.
SNIP
Which judges are out to rob Christians of their heritage? That is religious McCarthyism. Perkins should name them, provide evidence of their attempted theft of "our Christian heritage" or retract that statement with an apology. Don't count on that happening.
SNIP
It means challenging them when they say of Americans who support a woman's right to choose; the right of two adults to enter into a loving, committed, state-sanctioned, monogamous relationship; the right to pursue science in support of life; the right of the aggrieved to launch aggressive assaults against racism, sexism and homophobia, that they are not legitimate members of the flock.
SNIP
They are not now and never will be the final arbiters of Christian beliefs and values. They warrant as much deference as religious leaders as do members of the Ku Klux Klan, who also marched under the cross.
SNIP
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Which judges are out to rob Christians of their heritage? "
uh, maybe that Judge who told another Judge to demolish his ten commandments display ???
Or the Judge who decided "under God" has to be taken out of the pledge?
Or the Judge who forbade a valedictorian to quote scripture at her graduation ceremony?
... those judges, maybe ???
Evidently they would prefer us to be seen and not heard.
By George Wallace supporters I guess she means Sen. Byrd....
The Washington Peauxst continues to alienate a significant segment of potential subscribers.
God's Truth is marching on.
...the judges who order homosexual marriage be legalized...
Evidently they would prefer us to be (not)seen and not heard.
And one day, soon, God is going to give them what they want.
Only liberal churches are allowed to be involved in politics according to liberals like Colbert King.
Here the obvious ploy is to lump anti-communists, aka the Nixonites, in with racists, the George Wallace crowd. Also note the specific selection of the year 1969. I guess prior to 1969 that the author would have been dealing with Democrats running a half assed war and racist Democrats. Now that wouldn't work, would it.
Oh gee. Let's see..... How about:
The issue is that the Democrats want to impose a religious litmus test on the judiciary. They are trying to spin this as Republicans injecting religion into politics -- actually it is the Democrats who have done so by advocating religious discrimination.
I like it!
FMCDH(BITS)...(I'm a sarcastic curmudgeon SOB)
Bingo!
>>>It means challenging them when they say of Americans who support a woman's right to choose; the right of two adults to enter into a loving, committed, state-sanctioned, monogamous relationship; the right to pursue science in support of life; the right of the aggrieved to launch aggressive assaults against racism, sexism and homophobia, that they are not legitimate members of the flock. <<<
You forgot about the judges who ruled against prayer in school. the 10 commandments in the judge's office, prayer at commencement, prayer at football games. etc. etc.
All these rulings are against the "free exercise" clause in the first amendment and should be overturned and not enforced.
Well hell, you people on the left didn't seem to be using it.
LOL. Best post of the week.
"... they would prefer us to be seen and not heard."
Except when they're in trouble and a family member has been seriously injured or is seriously ill - who do they call - the people of FAITH - because they want us to PRAY.
I've always found this to be most amazing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.