Skip to comments.
Martha's big night out spurs probe
NY Daily News ^
| 4/24/05
| Jonathan Lemir
Posted on 04/24/2005 12:26:53 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
04/24/2005 12:26:53 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Well, we wouldn't want to endanger innocent people by having Martha roaming the streets, doing whatever it is she was convicted of.
To: wagglebee
3
posted on
04/24/2005 12:33:42 PM PDT
by
bikepacker67
(If Humans are Animals, why isn't PETA protesting the torture of Terri?)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: wagglebee
For someone under "house arrest" she sure manages to get around much.
Silly me, I thought house "arrest meant" you were actually under house arrest.
5
posted on
04/24/2005 12:36:09 PM PDT
by
stm
To: wagglebee
Yes by all means, let's go after Martha.
Please leave all the terrorists, pedophiles, rapists, murderers and illegal aliens alone while we concentrate on whether Martha was out at a party for her work or not.
6
posted on
04/24/2005 12:36:51 PM PDT
by
WestCoastGal
(Jr "Damn! We’re in the middle of a race, this aint no time to be tearing (stuff) apart! Heh!")
To: wagglebee
She got permission. Leave this woman alone!
7
posted on
04/24/2005 12:37:22 PM PDT
by
Hildy
To: stm
Silly me, I thought house "arrest meant" you were actually under house arrest.Well, if she has anyone that really doesn't like her, they can use this to throw her back in the prison for the remainder of her three months.
She shouldn't rock the system like this.
8
posted on
04/24/2005 12:38:06 PM PDT
by
SheLion
(Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
To: WestCoastGal
Please leave all the terrorists, pedophiles, rapists, murderers and illegal aliens alone while we concentrate on whether Martha was out at a party for her work or not.I sure know what you mean. And I hope she did get permission. The other side could very well use this to throw her back in prison. It's been a huge waste of money, IMHO. But you can imagine when you get people against you. They will do all they can to really stick it to her.
9
posted on
04/24/2005 12:40:04 PM PDT
by
SheLion
(Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
To: WestCoastGal
and don't forget Sandy "Socks" Berger. We gotta make sure Martha doesn't catch a break, (after she's already done the time for her crime), while Berger gets away with theft of classified documents.
10
posted on
04/24/2005 12:40:39 PM PDT
by
YaYa123
(@Can That Be Right?com)
To: wagglebee
Meanwhile, guess how many baby rapers they can't keep track of?
11
posted on
04/24/2005 12:41:39 PM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(Let Me Die on My Feet in the Swamp, BUAIDH NO BAS)
To: SheLion
According to what I've read, she did get permission to attend this event. What they are now trying to determine is if it meets the criteria she got permission for, i.e. somehow related to her work. Since so much of what someone like her does is promotional, it would seem to, but if you've got somebody wanting to stick it to her, they can hassle her for just about anything. I knew a guy who worked on the Leona Helmsley case for the FBI. He said they used to deliberately set early morning hearings in Manhattan, knowing she would have to get up in the middle of the night to attend them. He clearly enjoyed the harrassment.
12
posted on
04/24/2005 12:56:56 PM PDT
by
speedy
To: wagglebee
Good grief. Don't LEOs have any sensible priorities these days?
Who would you rather run into on a New York City Street at 3:00 in the morning, Martha Stewart or a mugger?
13
posted on
04/24/2005 1:14:09 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
Who would you rather run into on a New York City Street at 3:00 in the morning, Martha Stewart or a mugger?I'm thinking. I'm thinking!
14
posted on
04/24/2005 1:15:50 PM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(Look! Jimmy Carter! History's greatest monster!)
To: SheLion
The other side could very well use this to throw her back in prison.Who do you consider the "other side" in this one?
15
posted on
04/24/2005 1:22:59 PM PDT
by
Doe Eyes
To: wagglebee
I say everyone leave Martha alone. I don't even like her, actually I detest her, but enough is enough. If I was Martha, the embarrassment alone would be enough to put me in a depression for life.
16
posted on
04/24/2005 1:30:25 PM PDT
by
Ditter
To: Ditter
Shes a criminal and liar Throw back in Jail where she belongs
17
posted on
04/24/2005 1:33:53 PM PDT
by
GoShow
To: Ditter
I agree. I can't stand Stewart and I believe she got off fairly easy in her trial (actually she should have taken the deal that was first offered with no prison time). But what is the harm in someone (who is electronically monitored at all times) going to a function with hundreds of other people to be honored for her contributions to culture? She has to live with the stigma of her crime and for a prima donna like her that is the worst punishment of all.
18
posted on
04/24/2005 1:35:18 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Cicero
19
posted on
04/24/2005 1:36:19 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: GABaptist
20
posted on
04/24/2005 1:36:46 PM PDT
by
bvw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson