Replies

I'm talking quasi-underground intel on the net. People have suggested that "Debka" is an arm of the Moussad (putting out info and dis-info) yet being a glimpse of the intel OUR agencies willingly admint they are behind the 8-ball on. Global-security.org and all the DOCUMENTED satellite photos proving they are burring these faclities under 12ft of concrete and all the other 'noticable' but not reported stories. I don't know if they will have too much "new" stuff to me, but to millions of others I'm sure the overall picture, the dots connected, will be more substantial than you'll EVER see in the MSM.

I understand what you are saying - and I am sure there is some truth to some of these suggestions / observations by various "underground Intel" - While at the same time some of their conclusions are just flat out wrong -

We learned this via Iraq (in some ways) - However, I would suspect our Intel on Iran is better to a degree then what we had on Iraq (given our success and military assets on the ground in both Iraq and Afghanistan).

Either way the fact still remains there are no "good" solutions to the Iran problem.

I disagree... and not just for the bump ;)

Our Intel in Iraq was taken from 'the best we got'.

The Intel about Iran (largly) doesn't even come from the US. It comes from these quasi-open-source 'websites' like http://www.geostrategy-direct.com and other forign agencies that can't/won't "officially" announce these thigns.

Not that I think they should be taken as fact... far from it. I just think the danger encountered by silincing these likely possiblites is FAR greater than the dammage caused by 'being too suspicious of Iran'.

What ever happend to probable cause????