Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Southern Dems Disappearing
WINS News ^ | 4/25/05

Posted on 04/25/2005 11:47:47 AM PDT by areafiftyone

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In consecutive days last month, Alabama lost two legends from a disappearing movement - Southern Democrats who were powerful in Washington because of their party's majority and powerful back home because of their tendency to buck it.

Look around Congress these days and you'll find few conservative Democrats in the mold of the late Sen. Howell Heflin or Rep. Tom Bevill. Those who remain are almost as likely to represent the Midwest or Great Plains as the once-solid South.

According to Congressional Observer Publications, only one current House member voted against his party at least a third of the time last year. That was Democratic Rep. Collin Peterson of Minnesota.

In 1998, there were 13 in that category, including eight Southerners, and three of them opposed Democratic leaders more than half the time.

Virtually all those maverick-more-than-not lawmakers have either joined the Republican Party or retired. Most dramatic of all was retired Democratic Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia, the keynote speaker at the 2004 Republican National Convention, who voted with President Bush's party a staggering 94 percent of the time last year.

Merle Black, an Emory University political scientist, says more than 80 percent of white conservatives in the South now belong to the Republican Party, and only 10 percent are Democrats.

Unlike in the past, when seniority alone dictated leadership positions for the party, Black says parties now hand-pick their committee leaders. For Democrats, he said, that means the rewards tend to go more often to liberals.

"It's almost impossible to have a leadership position in the House Democratic Party if one behaves as a conservative," Black said.

Remaining Southern Democrats with conservative voting records would argue that the movement made famous by Heflin and Bevill and resurrected by Miller is alive and well. But even they acknowledge times are different.

For one thing, Republicans have ruled the chamber for more than a decade. Thus, some conservative Democrats in search of majority clout have found it through switching parties. Of the 15 congressional Democrats who became Republicans in the last 25 years, 13 of them are from the South.

Others scoff at that idea.

"I'd rather be in the minority the rest of my life than sell my convictions down the river," said Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark.

"Sometimes I don't think my leadership gets it," said Rep. Bud Cramer, D-Ala. "If they're to really stand the chance to take the House back, they've got to leave those members plenty of room to vote where their district is coming from rather than where the national party is coming from."

Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, a former Democrat, has encouraged Cramer for years to follow in his footsteps. Cramer says he's not uncomfortable enough with his party right now to take that leap.

Arkansas provides Democrats a model for broadening their Southern base. In 2000, the state's six-member congressional delegation was split - three Republicans and three Democrats. But Ross and Sen. Mark Pryor upset Republican incumbents, giving Arkansas Democrats their current 5-1 majority.

Arkansas and West Virginia are now the only Southern states where congressional delegations aren't dominated by Republicans.

Now in their ninth terms, Reps. John Tanner of Tennessee and Gene Taylor of Mississippi are two of the longest-serving conservative Democrats from Southern states. By the numbers, however, their voting records seem to be trending less conservative. Taylor bucked his party about 32 percent of the time last year, compared with 53 percent in 1998.

Tanner says the change in his voting record, less dramatic than Taylor's, is because Democrats have heeded the wisdom of successful Southerners and moved to the right, particularly on financial matters.

"The party has shifted - I haven't," Tanner said. "You have liberals now talking about balancing the budget. They're not doing it for the same reasons I am, but the vote looks the same on paper."

Still, many Southern Democrats complain their party hurts its chances down South by choosing liberal national leaders, such as Nancy Pelosi of California.

Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn., a conservative Democrat who challenged Pelosi for the party's top House job in 2002, says the problem is not the leadership, but the failure of Southern Democrats to demonstrate that they're not always in lockstep with those leaders.

"The national image of the Democratic Party does not sell well in the South," Ford said. "However, the position of national Democrats on fiscal matters, ironically, is more in line with where voters are. We have to do a better job of telling that story."

In some states, Republicans have reduced the comfort level for conservative Democrats by redrawing their districts. Eight from Texas resigned, switched parties or lost their seats last year because of redistricting, and Georgia's Republican Legislature is pushing the same process now with hopes of adding to the party's 7-6 advantage in the House.

Rep. Jim Marshall, a moderate Democrat who represents a middle Georgia district that could be affected, is confident he can win back his seat. The losers, he says, are the voters, because districts that once were considered toss-ups are being redrawn to lean heavily toward one party or the other.

As a result, the South is arguably no more likely to elect a Democrat to Congress from a Republican-leaning district than anywhere else. Signs of that are found in the membership of the Blue Dog Coalition, a fiscally conservative group of House Democrats. Of its 35 current members, less than half are from the South.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: realignment; southerndems; southernvote

1 posted on 04/25/2005 11:47:50 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

No longer a big tent, it appears.


2 posted on 04/25/2005 11:48:42 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Brilliant

Leftists hate the DINOS like Republicans hate the RINOS!


4 posted on 04/25/2005 11:49:54 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I wish we could have cloned Zell Miller, then used many of those clones to replace the RINOs and the limp weenies in the Congress. Wow, what a kick-butt GOP Congress we could have.... :-)


5 posted on 04/25/2005 11:50:45 AM PDT by EagleUSA (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel; Admin Moderator

Please provide a link where it is posted. Thanks. I did a search and couldn't find it.


6 posted on 04/25/2005 11:52:34 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Quote: "Arkansas provides Democrats a model for broadening their Southern base. In 2000, the state's six-member congressional delegation was split - three Republicans and three Democrats. But Ross and Sen. Mark Pryor upset Republican incumbents, giving Arkansas Democrats their current 5-1 majority.

Arkansas and West Virginia are now the only Southern states where congressional delegations aren't dominated by Republicans."

Yah, tht won't last for long. Pryor only won because of whats his name's marital problems.


7 posted on 04/25/2005 11:56:26 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: William Creel; Admin Moderator
Never mind I found where it was posted. The title was a bit different which is why it didn't show up.

Admin Moderator please delete - its a duplicate.

8 posted on 04/25/2005 11:56:36 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Democrats are dependent on interest groups and behave in favor of their sponsors.
Democrats are forced to place liberals in positions of influencing their party line.
Such behavior generated Red States, as conservative Democrats were relegated to subordinate existence and therefore vanished.
Howie Dean by proclaiming conservatives brain dead will further widen this divide and is in for his wake up call.
Screaming louder or fouler will not shield this mouthy Napoleon from his Waterloo as Howard conquers nothing.
9 posted on 04/25/2005 12:22:03 PM PDT by hermgem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

My stepfather was a lifelong conservatice Southern Democrat who in the 2004 election changed quicklike. He said it was official that the Democratic party had been hijacked by liberals. He voted for Bush, a first in his life of voting Republican.

Zell Miller was the finest governor of our state.


10 posted on 04/25/2005 12:28:41 PM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Conservative Southern Democrats are not disappearing. They are called Republicans now.


11 posted on 04/25/2005 12:55:47 PM PDT by kennedy ("Why would I listen to losers?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson