Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/25/2005 2:37:48 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000
though the operating system's most anticipated improvements in graphics appear to mirror what's now available from rival Apple Computer Inc.

Does the specific wording of this sentence suggest something about the writer?

2 posted on 04/25/2005 2:42:05 PM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
security features are expected that would make it more difficult for online criminals to break into PCs.

There's no way this is NOT going to be used for DRM - keeping track of whether you own that music track or not.

3 posted on 04/25/2005 2:42:19 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

That chip is a wolf in sheeps clothing.


5 posted on 04/25/2005 2:46:36 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

Simple answer: my next PC will be a Mac. Screw M$ and all their so-called improvements. The last OS they released they said the same crap - "The biggest improvemnt to Windows since '95" If I want to buy soimething as full of holes as XP, I'll stop by the local deli and buy a pound of swiss cheese.


10 posted on 04/25/2005 2:53:20 PM PDT by landorepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

"Some claimed it would enable strict copyright protection schemes for music, movies and software. It also could restrict the tinkering that has driven computer industry innovation over the years, they said."


12 posted on 04/25/2005 2:55:26 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
The security chip in computers running Longhorn

And just incidentally such a chip could be used to ensure Longhorn and all other Microsoft products installed on a particular machine are Microsoft-approved versions.

And just incidentally such a chip could be used to ensure compatibility problems with non-Microsoft products, such as Firefox.
14 posted on 04/25/2005 2:57:41 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

If I understand this correctly, it may not be possible to upgrade old computers to Longhorn.

That has always tended to be the case. I have upgraded a few computers in the past to a new operating system, but it's never been a painless procedure even if you format and start fresh.

For timing reasons I just had to buy a new laptop, so I'm not sure when I'll be able to get a new computer. I've heard good as well as bad things about Longhorn (the bad mostly from Apple lovers like this).


15 posted on 04/25/2005 2:58:15 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Microsuck stock up a penny.

And the crowd goes wild!

16 posted on 04/25/2005 2:58:24 PM PDT by paleocon patriarch ("Never attribute to a conspiracy that which can be explained by incompetence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

Security for the users or security for Hollywood and the recording industry?


20 posted on 04/25/2005 3:12:07 PM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Under the FWIW column, the Apple booth at last week's National Association of Broadcasters Convention was huge, jammed full of attendees, and buzzing hard all three show days I was there. The Microsoft booth was quiet for the most part.

Apple is looking good, even with its 5% market share. Longhorn could deliver another 5% market share to Apple, if not more.

23 posted on 04/25/2005 3:30:32 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Currently, such encryption locks are stored as data on a hard drive. It is, however, much more difficult to crack a chip.

Who writes this stuff? The difference between hardware and software implementation is purely one of performance (a dedicated chip can generally encrypt/decrypt faster). The security of the end result depends entirely on the soundness of the algorithm and the security of the key.

29 posted on 04/26/2005 8:51:57 AM PDT by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson