Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanArchConservative; Gondring

OK, so it appears that AACs interpretation of "stop tolerating" means that the Jews should embark on a sort of Holy War against Islam.

Since WE are not stupid enough to get suckered into giving Bin Laden the result he wanted, AAC turns to another way to support his goal.


219 posted on 04/30/2005 9:07:30 AM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: RS
I think that AAC's point was that we must be on the defensive with regard to the ultimate goal of modern Islam--a global caliphate that calls for Shar'iah as the rule of law.

We did not start out calling for the destruction of Islam; Islamist fascists called out for the destruction of the US and indeed began the war by attacking us on 9/11.

223 posted on 04/30/2005 9:25:22 AM PDT by ariamne (reformed liberal--Shieldmaiden of the Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: RS; ariamne; Fred Nerks

>"OK, so it appears that AACs interpretation of "stop tolerating" means that the Jews should embark on a sort of Holy War against Islam"<

Okay, so it appears that RS, desperately failing in this ongoing debate, and in his tunnel vision, lacking truly original ideas of his own, has resorted (yet again) to twisted misinterpretations of others' words in order to impute to them the meaning he wishes, rather than the meaning that is in fact resident in them.

One question: If you define the suggested action of Jews confronting the lies, hatred, and attacks (both verbal and otherwise) of the muslim world openly in the media and in public forums, and challenging the muslims with their own deplorable history as embarking on "a sort of Holy War" against Islam....

(I'll use small words here, since it seems large ones confuse you easily)

...then what do you call what the "Islamic world" is already obviously embarked upon against the Jews (and Christians)?

(Hint: The Islamic world calls it a "H--y W-r")

I did not suggest beginning by going to war, but it only takes one side to have a war, and since they've already declared one across the globe and backed it up by preferentially killing Jews, Christians, and recalcitrant (apostate) uncooperative brother and sister muslims, I just do not see how we are in any way obligate to capitulate, or lay down and die.

>"Since WE are not stupid enough to get suckered into giving Bin Laden the result he wanted, AAC turns to another way to support his goal."<

Since we are not ALL stupid enough be cowed or suckered into lying on the ground like some docile animal waiting for a big guy with a scowl on his face and a knife in his hand to come storming in, Bin Laden will not get the result he wanted.

I turn to the east, and say "if they will stay the hell OVER THERE, in their countries and kill no tourists, businessmen, visiting workers, or neighboring Jews and Christians, that will be good enough for me."

Try twisting someone else's words - someone who won't confront your fraudulent claims, call you on them, and demolish your BS, RS! Evidently those drugs your tagline references may have had significant and lingering detrimental effects...

(Oh dear! Oh my! I feel really really bad about myself. I may have just embarked upon a sort of "Holy War" against RS by my confrontational words...)

/SARC - OFF

A.A.C.


229 posted on 04/30/2005 12:05:36 PM PDT by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson