Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airbus A380 completes historic 1st flight
Daytona Beach News-Journal Online ^ | April 27, 2005 | By LAURENCE FROST

Posted on 04/27/2005 6:21:34 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican


BLAGNAC, France (AP) -- The world's largest passenger plane, the Airbus A380, completed a maiden flight Wednesday that took it over the Pyrenees mountains, a milestone for aviation and for the European aircraft-maker's battle with American rival Boeing Co.

The double-decked, 308-ton plane landed successfully to applause at 2:22 p.m (8:22 a.m. EDT) after a flight of nearly four hours. About 30,000 spectators watched the white plane with blue tail take off and touch down, 101 years after the Wright brothers achieved the first controlled, sustained flight.

Before it landed, its front lights shining, the A380 did a slow flyover above the airport in Blagnac, southwest France, where it had taken off at 10:29 a.m. (4:29 a.m. EDT).

The plane carried a crew of six and 22 tons of on-board test instruments. It can carry as many as 840 passengers on commercial flights.

"The takeoff was absolutely perfect," chief test pilot Jacques Rosay told reporters by radio from the A380 cockpit as he flew at 10,000 feet just north of the Pyrenees mountains, about an hour into the flight. "The weather's wonderful."

The pilots checked the plane's basic handling characteristics while the on-board equipment recorded measurements for 150,000 separate parameters and beamed real-time data back to computers on the ground.

Rosay, co-pilot Claude Lelaie and four fellow crew members took no chances - donning parachutes for the first flight. A handrail inside the test plane lead from the cockpit to an escape door that could have been jettisoned had the pilots lost control.

In Paris, French Cabinet ministers broke into applause when President Jacques Chirac told them of the successful start to the flight. The head of competitor Boeing's French division, Yves Galland, said he watched the televised takeoff and, just this once, "shared the emotion of the people of Airbus."

The flight capped 11 years of preparation and $13 billion in spending.

Orville and Wilbur Wright, by comparison, spent an estimated $1,000 developing their skeletal flyer, which stayed airborne for 12 seconds on the sands of Kill Devil Hills, N.C., the morning of Dec. 17, 1903.

Built of spruce and ash covered with muslin, the Wright brothers' flyer weighed 605 pounds, according to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington.

The A380 weighed 464 tons on takeoff, including its bulky test equipment, fittings and fuel, Airbus said. That is about 75 percent of its maximum authorized takeoff weight for commercial flights.

Spectators camped out by the airport to be there for what some said was Europe's biggest aviation event since the first flight of the supersonic Concorde in 1969. About 30,000 people gathered around the airport to watch, police said.

Emergency services took no chances and stationed fire trucks at regular intervals along the runway, although aviation experts say modern computer modeling and wind-tunnel tests have made maiden flights safer than ever.

Problems are more likely, but still very rare, later in the test-flight program, when the pilots deliberately take the plane to its limits. An Airbus A330 prototype crashed here in July 1994, killing chief test pilot Nick Warner and six others as they conducted a simulated engine failure exercise.

Airbus says the A380 test-flight program is likely to take over a year and finish soon before the plane enters service for Singapore Airlines in mid-2006.

The A380, with a catalogue price of $282 million, represents a huge bet by Airbus that airlines will need plenty of large aircraft to transport passengers between ever-busier hub airports.

So far, Airbus has booked 154 orders for the A380, which it says will carry passengers 5 percent farther than Boeing's longest-range 747 jumbo at a per-passenger cost up to one-fifth lower.

But Airbus has yet to prove that it can turn a profit on its investment, a third of which came from European governments. Some analysts say signs of a boom in the market for smaller, long-range jets like Boeing's long-range 787 "Dreamliner" show that Airbus was wrong to focus resources on the superjumbo at the expense of its own mid-sized A350 - which enters service in 2010, two years after its Boeing rival.

Just this week, Air Canada and Air India announced a total of 82 new orders for Boeing jets - including 41 787s - taking Boeing's Dreamliner order book to 237.

But Airbus CEO Noel Forgeard played down Boeing's recent orders and the 787's development lead, saying the battle for the market in smaller planes would be fought out over 20 years, not two.

"Our competitor Boeing has woken up and gets a wave of orders," Forgeard told reporters attending the A380 test flight. "Good! Competition is an excellent thing."

Forgeard, who steps down later this year to become joint CEO of Airbus parent European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co., congratulated the A380 development and test-flight team for a "fantastic collective effort" and said the plane would enter service in the "second half of 2006" - about three months behind the previous schedule.

Part of the delay is down to the superjumbo's struggle with a weight problem that consumed months of engineering time and pushed the program's cost overrun to $1.88 billion. Competitive pressure on airlines to offer plusher, heavier business-class seating tightened the squeeze.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 380; 747; a380; airbus; flight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-211 next last
To: Steve_Seattle

For what it's worth on the Boeing/Airbus spat:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13181-2004Oct6.html


41 posted on 04/27/2005 7:35:15 AM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Armando Guerra; cmsgop; Tennessee_Bob

here

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photogallery/Videos/707%20Roll.mpg


42 posted on 04/27/2005 7:35:43 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Duplicate posts are no longer a concern. Yep, I've reported a few lately and they are ignored.
43 posted on 04/27/2005 7:37:15 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Armando Guerra; Tennessee_Bob; cmsgop; Denver Ditdat
Cool webpage notice!

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/aviation_videos.htm
44 posted on 04/27/2005 7:38:29 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

The A380 is a terrorist's dream.


45 posted on 04/27/2005 7:38:39 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: RedBloodedAmerican

I'm going have to look at these at home BUMP.

I've seen the F-15 collision one before though - you hear the impact, the pilot begins making his calls and trying to save the jet - and then you hear Betty going "Caution, Caution..."


47 posted on 04/27/2005 7:43:29 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (The Crew Chief's Toolbox: A roll around cabinet full of specialists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Super 70"s , where the 70's never finished? Freaky LOL
I couldn't wait to get out of the 80's :)


48 posted on 04/27/2005 7:43:55 AM PDT by 1FASTGLOCK45 (FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
"Orville and Wilbur Wright, by comparison, spent an estimated $1,000 developing their skeletal flyer.."

That would be $21,303.47 in today's dollars.

Cordially,

49 posted on 04/27/2005 7:44:34 AM PDT by Diamond (Qui liberatio scelestus trucido inculpatus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Armando Guerra

I'm positive the pilot would not be willing to do a 1G roll, as that is not part of the flight test.

No reason he couldn't easily do it with the A380, though. You can do a 1G roll in any airplane. The 707 doesn't have an special flying characteristics. As Tex said, the airplane doesn't know it is upside down.


50 posted on 04/27/2005 7:45:42 AM PDT by Intombe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob

I hit "abuse" on the post 46; i googled for the video, didnt realize the website was owned by a gay male who has junk on his site.


51 posted on 04/27/2005 7:46:12 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
It's big, but still not biggest.

Behold the Antonov AN225




52 posted on 04/27/2005 7:46:48 AM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

No thanks. I'd rather ride in a Boeing.


53 posted on 04/27/2005 8:06:01 AM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Rosay, co-pilot Claude Lelaie and four fellow crew members took no chances - donning parachutes for the first flight. A handrail inside the test plane lead from the cockpit to an escape door that could have been jettisoned had the pilots lost control.

As if anyone had any real hope of getting out of an A/C of this class....
54 posted on 04/27/2005 8:14:05 AM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Can you imagine bailing out of one of these things?

I had a Chief in the Navy who was a Master Test Parachutist and had jumped out of C-5's a couple of times. He said it was like getting hit by a brick wall and then being in a washing machine. I can't even think about what would happen if an inexperienced jumper went out of the side of a plane that large at 500 mph.
55 posted on 04/27/2005 8:38:10 AM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Daus

I wondered about that too.

From my military experience I know that the evacuation system for the space shuttle was tested on a C-141, and had a rail that the jumper would lock into from the fight deck and simply slide down, out the forward hatch, and get shot out of the side of the plane. If you can picture that in a full space suit.

I think the railing may be something similar, not a hand rail as the article states.


56 posted on 04/27/2005 8:44:26 AM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: treuer Poster

You signed up today for that? I guess that was supposed to be a put-down of some kind... hard to tell - English isn't exactly your first language, is it?


58 posted on 04/27/2005 9:09:04 AM PDT by PrivateIdaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
It can carry as many as 840 passengers

The INS needs one of these for daily flights to Mexico City - Well, if they'd enforce the law that is ...

59 posted on 04/27/2005 9:11:44 AM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson