Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

V-Day anniversary is no reason for celebrations - Vilnius
Itar-Tass ^ | April 26

Posted on 04/27/2005 1:18:58 PM PDT by jb6

V-Day anniversary is no reason for celebrations - Vilnius

26.04.2005, 21.29

VILNIUS, April 26 (Itar-Tass) -- The Lithuanian Parliament thinks that the 60th anniversary of the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany is not a cause for celebrations.

“One cannot describe as a victory the event that extended the occupation of other countries, brought about enumerable losses and trampled upon expectations of democracy,” says a Tuesday statement by the parliament.

“The victory over Nazi Germany extended for decades the occupation of Lithuania and other Baltic countries,” the parliament said.

Earlier this year Lithuanian President Valdas Adamkus refused to visit Moscow on May 9 for celebrations of the victory anniversary.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: germany; lithuania; nazi; russia; war; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2005 1:19:06 PM PDT by jb6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jb6

somehow they're all gonna end up blaming the USA for the soviet occupation not caring one whit that it was the USA that was instrumental in ENDING it.


2 posted on 04/27/2005 1:21:12 PM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
somehow they're all gonna end up blaming the USA for the soviet occupation

I haven't gotten that buzz from Eastern Europeans, just the opposite, actually.

3 posted on 04/27/2005 1:26:21 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Deadcheck the embeds first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: camle
Lithuania's not usually part of the "blame America for everything" crowd. They have perfectly legitimate reasons to be less-than-enthusiastic over the U.S.S.R.'s victory.
4 posted on 04/27/2005 1:29:09 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: camle
I think the reality is a lot more complex than that. These countries really got pimped at the end WWII. Roosevelt and Truman screwed the pooch and left all of Eastern Europe in the Soviet Gulag. It was the Soviet's fault, they know this, they also know they the US didn't do much to help them. In any event the USA is generally very popular in the Baltics and Eastern Europe. Our hearts were in the right place and they know that too.
5 posted on 04/27/2005 1:29:15 PM PDT by don'tbedenied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: camle
You're wrong about the Lithuanians.

They love the US.

6 posted on 04/27/2005 1:34:58 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied

There's a lot of people who thought we should have let Patton have his way. Appeasing Russia brought about peace, but the price was extremely high.


7 posted on 04/27/2005 1:37:10 PM PDT by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: contemplator; Red6; BrooklynGOP; Destro; A. Pole; MarMema; YoungCorps; OldCorps; chukcha; ...
Fighting a land war against the Soviets in Europe is something the US was rather not prepared for. It suffered 400,000 or so casualties in WW2, fighting the Soviets would have caused that number to be more like 4,000,000+ and there was that whole war with Japan. The Soviets destroyed a millian man Japanese army in Manchuria, so we kinda rather still needed them.

And lets not forget that the Lithuanian Legion was a division in the Hitler loyal SS. Nor that the Lithuanian and Estonian SS helped exterminate Jews and were part of the forces destroying Warsaw block by block.

8 posted on 04/27/2005 1:43:54 PM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jb6
... But, then, of course, without massive US Lend-Lease aid to the USSR, which began prior to Pearl Harbor, the German Army and the USSR Army would have bled each other to death ...

Harry "The Hop" Hopkins, FDR's alter ego, ensured that the USSR got tens of tons of nuclear materials in the Spring of 1943 ... over a year before the Trinity Test. Oh, known now via the VENONA porject, "The Hop" was a Soviet agent.

9 posted on 04/27/2005 2:23:16 PM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Together with Russian Brigade of Waffen-SS.
10 posted on 04/27/2005 2:34:15 PM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

There were no Russian brigades in the Waffen-SS, Hitler's orders. There were Russian units, Cossaks and auxillaries in the Wehremacht. If you are comparing the Wehremacht to the SS, you've got a huge deficit in WW2 knowledge.


11 posted on 04/27/2005 2:38:51 PM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jb6

No, you've got a huge deficit in WW2 knowledge.


12 posted on 04/27/2005 2:41:49 PM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Yes, unfortunately there were Baltic Nazi collaborators, just as there were throughout all of occupied Europe. But any people who suffered from FDR's toadying to his beloved Uncle Joe have good reason to take any "celebrations" of Soviet victories with a five pound bag of salt. Eastern Europe was caught between the German hammer and Soviet anvil, and either choice was lousy. Concerning any post- 1945 conflict between the U.S. and the Soviets I am very skeptical about casualties in the millions had we(wisely) chosen to obliterate the Communists. Remember that Nazi forces were initially greeted as liberators in the Soviet territories they conquered. Imagine how Americans would have been received by the captive peoples of the Soviet gulag state when they arrived offering true liberation. The post-war world would have been a far happier place had Roosevelt not been a semi-closeted Bolshie and paid attention to the great Winston Churchill, who proposed an Anglo-American alliance to "strangle the Soviet infant in its crib".


13 posted on 04/27/2005 2:42:00 PM PDT by infidel dog (nearer my God to thee....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: infidel dog

The Americans wouldn't get a good response, first by then no one trusted invading outsiders, not after 20 million dead. Second the US army would have had to fight across half of Europe against twice as many men and air parity. Plus the US supply chain would have been across the Atlantic and all of Europe. Not gonna happen.


14 posted on 04/27/2005 2:46:15 PM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: camle

studied there => they've no love for USSR


15 posted on 04/27/2005 2:47:41 PM PDT by NCCarrs (http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/30/quake.usa.editorial.reut/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jb6

The point is that there shouldn't be Russian, Lithuanian, Polish or any other "National" truth. There should be a truth with no Nationality attached. Russian Leadership should not keep on repeating these Stalin era myths that Molotov-Ribentropp pact was a "necessity" to move Third Reich further to the West and that it was anything other than a brief tactical Nazi-Soviet alliance with tragic consequences for E. Europe. Modern Russian leaders should also look honestly at the role of Stalin regime in establishing communist puppet regimes in E. Europe at the end of WWII or shortly thereafter.

Baltic States in turn should not mythologize their own SS Legions or pro-Nazi Police as "freedom fighters" or defenders of the freedom and deny or downplay their role in Holocaust and other Nazi mass murders. We need to hear the whole Truth--not fictions or distortions of the reality.


16 posted on 04/27/2005 2:47:45 PM PDT by sergey1973 (Russian American Political Blogger, Arm Chair Strategist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jb6
The Soviets destroyed a millian man Japanese army in Manchuria

When was this? The USSR didn't even declare war on the Japanese until after we achieved victory over them.

17 posted on 04/27/2005 2:52:45 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: inquest
He is right. It was in 45 just after Germans had been defeated.
18 posted on 04/27/2005 2:58:27 PM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246
According to the encyclopedia I have in front of me, the U.S.S.R. declared war on Japan August 8, 1945 - two days after Hiroshima, and one day before Nagasaki. I don't suppose that the Japanese forces in Manchuria were much motivated to fight at that point. Even for the non-death-averse Japanese, I wouldn't imagine they were too inclined to die for an utterly lost cause.
19 posted on 04/27/2005 3:12:53 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: inquest

The official Capitulation of Japan was on Sep 2, 1945 (if I'm not mistaken), so there was still fighting in Manchuria and elsewere between Soviet and Japanese Troops in August.


20 posted on 04/27/2005 3:46:23 PM PDT by sergey1973 (Russian American Political Blogger, Arm Chair Strategist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson