Skip to comments.
Scientists Say Red Speck Is Indeed Huge New Planet
NY Times ^
| April 30, 2005
| DENNIS OVERBYE
Posted on 04/29/2005 10:22:03 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
1
posted on
04/29/2005 10:22:03 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
2
posted on
04/29/2005 10:23:40 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
23 billion milesPut that in MapQuest! That's far, far away
To: neverdem
Hereis a close-up of just the planet itself. I'll point to it:
> .
To: neverdem
5
posted on
04/29/2005 10:31:21 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
To: NormsRevenge
Caption to image in #5
Caption: ESO PR Photo 14a/05 The first planet outside of our solar system to be imaged orbits a brown dwarf (centre-right) at a distance that is nearly twice as far as Neptune is from the sun. The photo is based on three near-infrared exposures (in the H, K and L' wavebands) with the NACO adaptive-optics facility at the 8.2-m VLT Yepun telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory.
6
posted on
04/29/2005 10:32:03 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
To: PatrickHenry
7
posted on
04/29/2005 10:32:55 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Charles Henrickson; neverdem; mikrofon
orbits a kind of failed star known as a brown dwarf
8
posted on
04/29/2005 10:34:45 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Forbidden? PLAN IT!)
To: NormsRevenge
Thanks for the pic. Where did you happen to find it?
9
posted on
04/29/2005 10:36:54 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
You'll know if it's a real planet if there's ReMax 'For Sale' signs all over it.
10
posted on
04/29/2005 10:37:24 PM PDT
by
xJones
To: martin_fierro
11
posted on
04/29/2005 10:37:41 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: stainlessbanner
Thats 23 billion miles from the parent star.
The planet is about 1,350 trillion miles away from us.
12
posted on
04/29/2005 10:39:30 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(If Con is the opposite of Pro, what is the opposite of Progress?)
To: neverdem
13
posted on
04/29/2005 10:39:36 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
To: neverdem
Wait a minute. Wasn't part of the main premise of Arthur C. Clarke's 2010 that Jupiter's mass isn't far shy of what it would take to make it ignite into a star? How the heck can this planet be
five times the mass of Jupiter and not start fusing it's lighter elements under it's own extreme gravitational pressure? Or was Clarke taking
extreme liberties with science for the sake of his story? I can see him do that in areas where the science would be less well-established, but taking liberties on something like this seems uncharacteristic of him.
Qwinn
14
posted on
04/29/2005 10:42:12 PM PDT
by
Qwinn
To: martin_fierro
I'll see your Gary Coleman and raise you one Herve Villechaize
What do you think of that?
To: Qwinn
Liberties. You would have to stack on about 79 more Jupiters to ignite it into a "brown dwarf"
16
posted on
04/29/2005 10:43:12 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(If Con is the opposite of Pro, what is the opposite of Progress?)
To: Crazieman
I don't mean necessarily into a brown dwarf, I mean any kind of star. Are you saying it would take a mass of 79 jupiters to start fusing hydrogen?
Qwinn
17
posted on
04/29/2005 10:44:29 PM PDT
by
Qwinn
To: Crazieman; Qwinn
As an addendum, when it was written, it was generally thought Jupiter was at the near-limit.
As more science was gathered on Jupiter and theories developed, it was later established that Jupiter was in fact, far too small.
This was confirmed through the discoveries of extrasolar planets starting in 1990 having masses of 20-50 Jupiters.
(Note, these planets were all discovered indirectly through "wobble" and "occultation" observations, never directly)
18
posted on
04/29/2005 10:45:41 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(If Con is the opposite of Pro, what is the opposite of Progress?)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Qwinn
Well, about 80 Jupiters is thought to be the flashpoint.
And even then it would be a very dull star. "Brown dwarf"
20
posted on
04/29/2005 10:46:22 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(If Con is the opposite of Pro, what is the opposite of Progress?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson