Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Clinton Group Joins With Former Clinton Donor
NY Times ^ | May 3, 2005 | RAYMOND HERNANDEZ

Posted on 05/03/2005 3:21:39 AM PDT by Pharmboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: kristinn; Angelwood

Do either of you have access to the picture of David Kendall sitting on his briefcase during the impeachment hearings?


21 posted on 05/03/2005 6:33:30 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

"It's totally in the hands of the Republicans. How they handle it. Which makes me shudder with fear, believe me, knowing that the "professional campaign managers" in the Republican Party have blown more opportunities at bringing clarity to issues than the Palestinians have blown opportunities for real peace."

Unfortunate but true. Hillary can win if she sets the agenda - that broad brush of 'fear','religous extremism', and other words that set the tone AND if the Republicans put up a non-contestant like Dole again. No, I am hoping we get someone capable of articulating conservative TRUTH; window dressing won't cut it. Along with defense 'sense', gun rights, immigration reform, tax policy, and abortion law will be the primary factors in making the ideas work.

Defeating her in '06 is a great idea (though I agree that the GOP candidates don't look very strong at the moment), but it needs to be a political destruction that can't rise from the dead for a run in '08, not a mere defeat.

There is one other factor not yet considered, and that is the internal problems the Democrats will face as they argue with each other on why they lost again in '06. DCC Chariman Howard Dean may be the best secret weapon against the Clintons that we have....


22 posted on 05/03/2005 6:52:31 AM PDT by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
If Peter Paul was such a bad guy, how is it that the Clintons and the Secret Service apparently never checked out Peter Paul? How is it that he was able to sit with them at dinner and at the concert? Why did Hillary return his $2,000 donation to her campaign but not reimburse him for the $2 million?

Hillary is a tyrant who must always be in control of everything. Does anyone believe she did not order the now indicted David Rosen to phony up reports? Does anyone think he did that on his own?

23 posted on 05/03/2005 9:03:11 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Not too much of a slanted headline, huh? Anti-Clinton group. Hernandez is the designated reporter from the NY TIMES to cover this adventure.

Guess what, NY TIMES? You no longer have a monopoly on what is news and what people should believe. Those of us in pajamas now have our say. Go ask Dan Rather.

24 posted on 05/03/2005 9:08:56 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
HERE IS A STORY WITHOUT THE CLINTON BUTT-KISSING
25 posted on 05/03/2005 9:13:11 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The man whose claims are behind the recent criminal indictment of Hillary Rodham Clinton's former fund-raising director
=====================================================================

Actually, the man behind the criminal indictment would typically be a federal prosecutor. And the man who committed the felonies would also have something to do with it. But I guess Hernandez knows best.

26 posted on 05/03/2005 9:48:48 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Responding to Mr. Paul's latest endeavor, David E. Kendall, a lawyer for the Clintons, called Mr. Paul's character into question. "Peter Paul is a man with an impressive record of felony convictions, currently in federal custody," he said. "Most of his civil suit has already been dismissed and the remainder has no merit."
===========================================================

As usual, this is total B.S. from Kendall. Without FreeRepublic, he would get away with it. The case proceeds. What was thrown out was thrown out because the statute of limitations had tolled. The Clintons have tried to stop this at the trial level, the appellate level, and the California Supreme Court level. Lost, lost, lost. The case proceeds. He insults the California Supreme Court who determined that the case has merit. I wish they would hold him in contempt or gag him.

27 posted on 05/03/2005 10:24:05 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The Hillary Clinton Accountability Project goes live tonight at 9pm. See this thread for details.
28 posted on 05/03/2005 4:36:55 PM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; Interesting Times
The Biased Liberal media is EAGER to report that Hitlery is
"Moving to the center."

Ha! Yeah, right. When pigs fly.

Check out her "Move to the center" here, per the ACU. She
went from "10" in 2003 to a GOOSE EGG (0) in 2004, on a
scale of 100 = perfect conservative.

Moving to the center? He**, she's farther left in 2004 than
EVER!



Click here or on the pic for the article.


Hillary's Rating per the ACU


Senator Hillary Clinton (D)
New York
Democrat, Years of Service: 4

ACU Ratings for Senator Clinton:
Year 2004 0
Year 2003 10
Lifetime 9

29 posted on 05/03/2005 5:31:37 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
That cackle in response to questions she doesn't want to answer

Since when does Hillary permit questions she doesn't want to answer to be asked?

30 posted on 05/04/2005 3:06:42 AM PDT by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: laredo44

I heard that hideous cackle in response to a few of Tim Russert's questions on MTP. And there was one other interview she gave where she used it a few times...the interviewer escapes me for now. It might have been an old Katie Couric/Today Show interview.


31 posted on 05/04/2005 3:09:57 AM PDT by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Your prediction that Hillary will not debate is right on!

She will NEVER expose herself in any forum that will force her to answer questions that she has no clue as to what the answers might be.

If she is up against Condi, the contrast would be striking.


32 posted on 05/04/2005 3:28:52 AM PDT by Grateful One (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson