Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeJ75
The Founders were rightly afraid of majoritarian tyranny, and they wrote a Constitution designed to thwart it. Everything about the Constitution -- enumerated powers, separation of powers, two bodies of Congress elected in different ways, the electoral college, the Bill of Rights -- is designed to protect liberty by restraining majorities.

Strange how Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, says "provided two thirds of the Senators present concur" to ratify a treaty but makes no such distinction regarding "Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law". It would seem "The Founders" didn't feel that the majority needed to be as restrained regarding nominations as they wanted them with treaties.

Why shouldn't it take 60 or 67 votes to get a lifetime appointment as a federal judge?

Because that's not the way "The Founders" decided the process should work when they set up the constitutional and governmental structures that pertain to this issue.

What chucklehead.

31 posted on 05/05/2005 12:39:22 PM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: michigander
What a chucklehead. Oops!
32 posted on 05/05/2005 12:40:24 PM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson