Hmmm...
1 posted on
05/06/2005 7:36:09 PM PDT by
DouglasKC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: gobucks; mikeus_maximus; MeanWestTexan; JudyB1938; isaiah55version11_0; bondserv; plain talk
4 posted on
05/06/2005 7:43:55 PM PDT by
DouglasKC
To: DouglasKC
Information such as this has led to the debate about teaching intelligent design in the school science classes. The theory of evolution no longer holds water. There's way too many holes in it to consider it logical.
To: DaveLoneRanger
ping...and with that, could you remove me from your ping list? thanks :)
6 posted on
05/06/2005 7:45:35 PM PDT by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on.....)
To: DouglasKC
Dr. Behe spoke in Ithaca this past week, and reiterated - by citing writings of prominent Darwinists themselves - that no one has yet demonstrated how any complex biochemical systems have "happened to develop" in the incremental stepwise manner that classical Darwinism requires.
9 posted on
05/06/2005 7:48:44 PM PDT by
Tirian
To: DouglasKC
Claiming that DNA is complex is hardly evidence that evolution is false. If you keep telling people that something is too complex for them to understand, apparently some of them start to believe it's magic.
13 posted on
05/06/2005 7:56:07 PM PDT by
sigSEGV
To: MacDorcha
To: PatrickHenry
16 posted on
05/06/2005 7:58:26 PM PDT by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: DouglasKC; killermosquito
Great post.
Self ping for later reading.
17 posted on
05/06/2005 8:01:12 PM PDT by
killermosquito
(Hillary, go back to the little rock you crawled out from under!)
To: DouglasKC
News flash! A bible-oriented magazine doesn't like evolution!
Next you'll be telling us the sun rises in the east.
Oh, and by the way. That's not proof of anything. Sorry.
To: DouglasKC
"the Good News" magazine is always an excrement source for balanced scientific articles.
25 posted on
05/06/2005 8:10:48 PM PDT by
Eddeche
To: DouglasKC
I've been reading the posts and I just have to ask ...
Is it possible that the same society of scientists who fervently defend the religion of global warming could be wrong about evolution too?
35 posted on
05/06/2005 8:19:29 PM PDT by
Pan_Yan
(All grey areas are fabrications.)
To: DouglasKC
"The Tiny Code That's Toppling Evolution"
To: DouglasKC
As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpectedan exquisite 'language' composed of some 3 billion genetic letters.Huh?
46 posted on
05/06/2005 8:29:28 PM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: DouglasKC
Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of 'letters' in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual?Only God knows, for only God could.
To: DouglasKC
Creationism is bunk. Neanderthal stuff. What idiot would waste all of his time writing such silly drivel??!! This crap should be on an Art Bell site. Not the Free Republic.
To: DouglasKC
Fascinating ... bookmarking
126 posted on
05/06/2005 9:19:54 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no)
To: Elsie; AndrewC; jennyp; lockeliberty; RadioAstronomer; LiteKeeper; Fester Chugabrew; ...
144 posted on
05/06/2005 9:30:15 PM PDT by
bondserv
(Alignment is critical! †)
To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; St. Johann Tetzel; DaveTesla; mercygrace; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping.
Normally I avoid evolution/creationism threads like the plague, but this article kind of stood out. I admit I didn't read the whole thing - too late at night with my eyes at half mast.
BTW, my understanding of creationism doesn't include the earth being only 6000 years old; but that's neither here nor there. The important point, I believe, in these matters is this:
If life evolved from non-life, in a basically accidental and random manner, with no oversight from the Supreme Being, then life is meaningless. Is this true? Does this philosophy cause people to be hopeless and depressed, and search only for immediate sense flashes since there is no life after death, no soul, and no purpose to the universe?
Or are we better served by not clinging to the Darwinist evolutionary beliefs just because everyone else who matters does, and we'll be considered religious wingnuts if we don't agree? Aren't we better served if we open our minds to finding the truth?
Let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
202 posted on
05/06/2005 10:48:47 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
To: DouglasKC
Bump to read when I'm wide awake.
205 posted on
05/06/2005 10:54:09 PM PDT by
Bernard Marx
(Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
To: DouglasKC
207 posted on
05/06/2005 10:55:43 PM PDT by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson