Posted on 05/09/2005 5:57:02 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - The Senate moved Monday to add about $11 billion to a six-year highway and transit bill, putting it on a collision course with the Bush administration and a threatened veto.
Senate leaders said the revised package with the extra money, which would raise spending for the long-delayed legislation to about $295 billion, would be paid for by finding new revenue for the federal highway trust fund. A vote on the bill, including the $11 billion addition, could come by the end of the week.
But Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, in a statement put out in anticipation of the Senate move, said it would bankrupt the trust fund - the money coming in from the federal gas tax - by using accounting gimmicks.
"There is a dark cloud looming that will needlessly delay many important highway and transportation projects," Mineta said.
The previous six-year highway bill expired in September 2003, and has had to be continued through six temporary extensions because of conflict between Congress and the White House over spending levels.
Last year the White House proposed a $256 billion package, up from $218 billion from the 1998-2003 act, and threatened to veto any bill that added to the federal deficit. This year the administration has said that anything above $284 billion, the number approved by the House in March, would be subject to a presidential veto.
The Senate, which last year approved a $318 billion bill, has pressed for higher spending, saying more was needed to reverse the current situation of inadequate, congested and deteriorating roadways.
The Texas Transportation Institute's 2005 Urban Mobility Report issued Monday found that in 2003 there were 3.7 billion hours of travel delay and 2.3 billion gallons of wasted fuel for a total cost of more than $63 billion to the nation.
Senate leaders hope to finish work on their bill this week, setting the stage for negotiations with the House on a compromise measure that might be acceptable to the administration. The latest extension expires May 31.
"There may be more of a will to get it done" this year, said Steve Sandherr, CEO of the Associated General Contractors of America and a leading proponent of a robust bill. He said the disparity with the White House wasn't as great as last year. "Over six years, $11 billion is not a big deal" for such a major bill, he said.
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman James Inhofe, R-Okla., said the extra $11 billion, which includes about $8.8 billion for the highway program and $2.15 billion for transit, would help ease the discord resulting from some states paying more into the highway trust fund than they get back in federal grants.
Inhofe said the money would mean that states would immediately get a minimum guarantee of 91 cents back for every dollar sent to Washington, with the rate going up to 92 percent by the end of the legislative period. Donee states, who get more than they pay in, would be assured of a growth in funds given the larger pool of money.
The new revenue package, crafted by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and ranking Democrat Max Baucus of Montana, would not increase the federal gas tax, now 18.4 cents per gallon of gas.
The money would come from steps to prevent fuel tax evasion, and shifting some funds that now go to the general Treasury fund, including a gas guzzler tax, to the highway trust fund. There would be provisions to close corporate tax loopholes to assure that there would be no losses to the general fund.
---
The bill is H.R. 3
On the Net:
Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov/
When is Bush ever going to excercise the veto? I believe he holds a record (0) for the # of vetoes. Someone needs to put a muzzle on the spending in congress!
I spell pork......GOP.
Absolutely. If there ever was a time for a symbolic veto, this is it. Just breaking the suspense of this reverse "no hitter" would be worth it. Why take a Constitutional power off the table by not using it?
oink oink oink oink SOOOOOOOOOEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Sounds like a perfect bill for Bush to veto---if for no other reason than to get rid of the moniker of being the only president not to veto a bill....
Hometown payoffs.
I wonder how many 'robert byrd rest stops' and other assorted pork in WV this bill includes?
The money would come from steps to prevent fuel tax evasion,
I wonder what that is about? Who (or what) is evading fuel taxes?
There is a few million bucks buried in there, to put a bus stop a mile from my house.
It's boilerplate. The most common "fuel tax evasion" probably consists of farmers filling their pick-ups with "farm diesel" -- i.e., the diesel they buy by the tank and store on their farm for off-road use by farm equipment (tractors, harvesters, etc.).
Most farmers are scrupulously honest and don't cheat. Plus, I don't know how you'd catch the offenders without flying squads and numerous checkpoints on rural roads --making the exercise more costly than it would be worth.
With an immense effort, they won't recoup more than a fraction of the claimed "billions". But, to a Congressman, that's not the point, is it? The real point is spending that extra $11 billion.
HAHAHAH, BUSH STUPID -- NO KNOW HOW TO VETO
[...]
With an immense effort, they won't recoup more than a fraction of the claimed "billions". But, to a Congressman, that's not the point, is it? The real point is spending that extra $11 billion.
Goodness. Farm diesel?
A search on the net showed that the federal excise tax is only 25 cents a gallon for road diesel; even if there are a couple of thousand farmers out there evading the tax and illicitly driving, say, 30,000 miles each year, at an average of 15 miles per gallon that comes to $500 per scofflaw farmer, or maybe $1,000,000 assuming that we have 2,000 of those miscreants out there keeping the roads hot.
The cost of finding and fining those 2,000 tax-dodging farmers is going to be a lot more than $1 million.
If states expect the money back, why not have them collect and spend it themselves? Get the Feds out of it altogether.
"A billion here, and a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money." --Senator Everett McKinley Dirksen (R-Illinois)
But the senators would have you believe that they've got a way to do it...so they can spend the money.
This is budgeting by wishcast, the kind of thing no family nor any business would every succeed in doing. But that won't stop Congress.
But the senators would have you believe that they've got a way to do it...so they can spend the money.
This is budgeting by wishcast, the kind of thing no family nor any business would every succeed in doing. But that won't stop the porkers in Congress.
Bush hasn't vetoed a damn thing and he is not about to start now. The Republicans are making FDR look like Hayek.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.