Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GrandEagle
And the provision in the Constitution authorizing the Congress to make such an edict?

Actually the article is poorly written. There is no such edict.

There is nothing in the Real ID Act that forces the states to standardize their licenses or verify citizenship. They are strongly encouraged to take these steps but they are free to issue licenses to whomsoever they please. This is Constitutionally proper and states rights' have been maintained.

What the Real ID Act says is that drivers licenses from states that do not comply with the voluntary guidelines will not be acceptable as Federal ID for such purposes as entering Federal Buildings or boarding airplanes. Clearly the Federal government has the Constitutional authority to say what kind of ID is acceptable for entering Federal Buildings and the Interstate Commerce provisions of the Constitution have always given the Federal Government the power to regulate the airports and the commercial airline industry.

There is nothing in the Constitution that says the Federal Government has to accept bogus drivers licenses that are issued by the states particularly when some of those states refuse to take basic security precautions such as verifying the citizenship, legal status or even the true identity of the person to whom they are issuing a license. Those states are endangering all of us in every other state that has a saner policy.

People who live in states whose State Government uses their states' rights authority to not conform with the new standards will still be able to fly and enter Federal Buildings. They will just need to get an acceptable alternative form of Federal ID. It is called a passport. I suspect the citizens of those states will find this sufficiently irritating so that they will pressure their state legislatures to comply with the voluntary Federal standards.

53 posted on 05/10/2005 9:23:09 AM PDT by jackbenimble (Import the third world, become the third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: jackbenimble

No thanks.


87 posted on 05/10/2005 10:15:37 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: jackbenimble
There is no such edict.
Good point
92 posted on 05/10/2005 10:45:15 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson