Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GrandEagle; Behind Liberal Lines
And the provision in the Constitution authorizing the Congress to make such an edict?

I believe it is legal for the states to ignore such rules set by the federal government.

However might the federal goverment stop certain funding to such states?

57 posted on 05/10/2005 9:32:06 AM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Age of Reason

Ahh.. The extortion of the federal government must ....hopefully.... end somewhere.


60 posted on 05/10/2005 9:35:41 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Age of Reason
"However might the federal goverment stop certain funding to such states?"

They did it once before when they couldn't force states to adopt a standard drinking age limit. When their unconstitutional legislation got tossed by the courts, they simply told the states that they would lose all Federal highway funding if they didn't comply with the demands of the Federal government. In other words, they blackmailed the states into doing something they couldn't legally force them to do.
67 posted on 05/10/2005 9:55:09 AM PDT by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Age of Reason
However might the federal goverment stop certain funding to such states?
Another reason why we need to return our federal government to a Constitutional spending pattern - to avoid just such blackmail.
But, to answer your question, yes.

GE
93 posted on 05/10/2005 10:47:58 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson