Well, it looks like someone woke you up with your panties in a bunch. I've issued retractions when I made an error, and without others telling me it was necessary. Anything else, Mr. Pious?
I apologise for the Mr. Pious remark. That was uncalled for.
"Well, it looks like someone woke you up with your panties in a bunch. I've issued retractions when I made an error, and without others telling me it was necessary. Anything else, Mr. Pious?"
I am a Ms.
I don't see the problem with anything I have said. I suspect a few people have made really bad assumptions here and instead of admitting they are wrong, they are throwing out charges hoping one will stick. None of em do. If I, or my friend are pro-environment and hurt no one, there is no issue because this is the USA and we can think as we wish and care about what we wish.
I apparantly do have to tell you and others they are in error, because I said nothing you charged me with saying. I have every right to defend myself. You have basically called me an eco-terrorist sympathizer and I highly resent it. My friend, whose hobby is photographing wildflowers, did nothing at all to offend you or anyone, but is attacked here, merely because I said he travels California photographing wildflowerrs. A BENIGN and wholesome hobby, I'd say. But you and others think he's a bad person for doing so, making hysterical allegations against him based on NOTHING. This is the most ridiculous thing I have had to defend here, with a few exceptions.
Did I call you anti-nature? That would be the equivalent of the charges you made, but I know to look at the facts first and not say something I do not know to be true. Therefore I have nothing to apologize for. You do. Instead of doing so, you call me pious.