To: areafiftyone
Any news on Pennsylvania?
2 posted on
05/13/2005 9:08:45 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: areafiftyone
In New Jersey, Fort Monmouth is among the bases the Defense Department wants to close. A total of 5300 hundred jobs would be eliminated.This would really hurt Monmouth County...
3 posted on
05/13/2005 9:08:56 AM PDT by
frogjerk
To: areafiftyone
I thought blue state voters would be used to losing by now.
4 posted on
05/13/2005 9:09:55 AM PDT by
TXBSAFH
(Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, who's bringing the chips?)
To: areafiftyone
Here in Western NY where most people work on the governent dole or receive a government dole, the closing of several military facilities is disastrous. But not as disastrous as having Schumer and Hitlery and Slaughter leading our delegation in the Washington.
8 posted on
05/13/2005 9:14:41 AM PDT by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: areafiftyone
Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, a Democrat, says it's irrational, irresponsible and unthinkable to close the sub base. Second District Congressman Rob Simmons, a Republican, says this will be a bipartisan fights to reverse the plans to close the base.The thing that RATS and Pubbies can agree on these days is pork. It's an equal opportunity opportunity. I have a problem with some of bases that are on this list but - if we dont face the 21st century threat realistically and adjust our military accordingly, we're in trouble. Despite the efforts by alot of well intentioned people last time to save their favorite fort or base, the world did not end and life in those communities adjusted to the new reality. And - many are better off because of it.
10 posted on
05/13/2005 9:20:49 AM PDT by
capydick
("The current tax code is a daily mugging." --Ronald Reagan)
To: areafiftyone
Looks like the blue military hating states took a hit...
11 posted on
05/13/2005 9:23:27 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: areafiftyone
i think Groton is one of those bits you put into deals that you know you aren't going to fight for... a built in give back so to speak, cause it'd be wrong to close Groton
12 posted on
05/13/2005 9:25:04 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: areafiftyone
The government is just saving money by stream lining, just like US corporations moving manufacturing overseas. Before you know it, the Army, Navy, Marines will outsource military jobs (grunts, legs, etc.0 to the Iraqis and Afghanis after stability is reached in that country and their military training pars with America's. Oh let's say, about 10 yrs?. Could save 75% on the cost of hiring and training an American, and then our tax bill would go down (yeah, right!).
Better not hear anyone supporting uncontrolled borders and immigration griping about job losses to base closures.
16 posted on
05/13/2005 10:31:45 AM PDT by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: areafiftyone
I thought blue staters loathed the military. It's not a jobs program, you nitwits.
To: areafiftyone
Gee, Hillary! is on the Senate Armed Services Committee, isn't she?
21 posted on
05/16/2005 12:56:27 PM PDT by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson