In an openly declared war, ongoing for years, there are no civilian targets.
We have never declared a war on anyone on religious grounds.
The islamic animals do not fail for a single day to define their murderous, primitive and mindless mass murder worldwide in religious terms. Their mosques preach it daily, their press screams it hysterically.
Are you mentally challenged? or simply an enemy plant?
Consistent with your "logic," you'd have to agree that in Iraq, hypothetically, there's no moral difference between firing at a sand dune and a crowded school. Funny, I see a difference.
The islamic animals do not fail for a single day to define their murderous, primitive and mindless mass murder worldwide in religious terms. Their mosques preach it daily, their press screams it hysterically.
Now, do you want to give them the sweet gift of democracy, which according to GB will solve all our problems, or do you, along with the author of this puerile article, want to declare a war on all 1,000,000,000 muslims? It seems like your intent is the latter, which contradicts your statement: We have never declared a war on anyone on religious grounds. So let's start now! You know logical consistency is a philosophic virtue.
I'll pace back and forth for a while and try to figure out which is a more disastrous, foolhardy idea: spreading democracy or declaring war on Islam.