Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hetty_Fauxvert

They should agree to turn over the "anonymous source" who made up the lie. Why is he being protected?


60 posted on 05/17/2005 4:44:16 PM PDT by boop (Testing the tagline feature!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: boop
They should agree to turn over the "anonymous source" who made up the lie. Why is he being protected?

Interesting question, let's speculate. Remember in Rathergate when CBS claimed their 4 faxed memos were backed by "um impeachable sources"? It turned out that there was only 1 source, Bill Burkett, a wackjob twice committed to stays in mental hospitals, and who was also a rabid left-wing Democrat that had been after the Bush family for over 30 years. "Impeachable", my derriere!

Whatever source they had in the Pentagon was obviously a flake because even Newsweek said that on further questioning he/she couldn't back up his/her Koran flushing story.

They hung their whole story on one person that couldn't verify his/her claim afterward, and Newsweek claimed that they had earlier approached two other "sources" for confirmation, but one "source" wouldn't answer, and the other denied it. And those jackasses still ran with the story.......they must have wanted it really bad.

62 posted on 05/18/2005 2:50:04 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson