Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JayAr36
I totally agree with you; however, since females get EXACTLY the same pay, retirement, and other benifts as men then damn it they should have to do EXACTLY the same type work regardless of where that work might take place!
9 posted on 05/17/2005 6:07:31 AM PDT by sinbad17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: sinbad17
You have the beginning of a fascinating argument.

Most people would agree that women should not have a direct role in combat, i.e. the infantryman. With regard to the support MOS, restricting women from being in proximity to units engaged with the enemy, a two-tiered system develops. Fairness would require a concomitant two-tier pay/benefit system. Moreover, if there were not sufficient males to perform these duties, there could be a conscription of males as well as an exclusion of female volunteers.

The god-damned politicians need to keep their hands off before they create a nightmare.

11 posted on 05/17/2005 6:26:13 AM PDT by verity (A mindset is an antidote to logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: sinbad17

I think women should be allowed in combat... Provided they meet all the requirements of the men.

And the standard must be set at the highest level (ie - the male standard).

It's just that you wouldn't see very many women in combat as they (mostly) would not be able to meet the standard.

The few that make it... Heck, they'd be just as strong and capable as the rest of the guys, so why not?

---

Above all, there should NEVER be a watered-down standard for the women.


16 posted on 05/17/2005 8:26:44 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Raaargh! Raaargh! Crush, Stomp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson