[Neocon Shavuz]

You are right, Pat doesn't measure sculls to prove his point, but I know he is antisemite, and so do you.
I won't argue with anything he said or might say in the future. Anything he says is tainted by his bias.
As about ANY issue, one should value opinion expressed not buy any openly-biased sides (like Pat or me)
but independent, unemotional source, like the link I have posted.

[TomB]

I won't argue with anything he said or might say in the future. Anything he says is tainted by his bias.

Anything?! If Pat says 2+2=4, will you deny the truthfulness of that statement because of "bias"? What an utterly vapid statement.

But further on point, those facts in the article are not "his", but actual statements. They conclusively prove, without the bias of historical revisionism, that Pius did indeed speak out forcefully against the Nazis and help the Jews.

As about ANY issue, one should value opinion expressed not buy any openly-biased sides (like Pat or me) but independent, unemotional source, like the link I have posted.

What makes your link "independent" and "unemotional"?