To: freepatriot32
"...$17,500 in damages to several homosexuals ..."
Apart from not liking the message, how were they 'damaged'?
6 posted on
05/18/2005 3:13:25 PM PDT by
nosofar
To: nosofar
Apart from not liking the message, how were they 'damaged'? And if they were "damaged", doesn't that prove him right that homosexuality is dangerous?
To: nosofar
how were they 'damaged'?cause al lthose dirty words hurt thier fragile wittle minds
25 posted on
05/18/2005 3:24:36 PM PDT by
freepatriot32
(If you want to change government support the libertarian party www.lp.org)
To: nosofar
"...$17,500 in damages to several homosexuals ..."
Only Canadian dollars.
35 posted on
05/18/2005 3:39:41 PM PDT by
toddlintown
(Your papers please.)
To: nosofar
"Apart from not liking the message, how were they 'damaged'?"
From what I understand, these homosexuals were probably already damaged mentally before the flyer ever reached `em. Proving it was the proximate cause in a court would be fun.
But then, this is the Kangaroo Kanadian Kourt. Rules don't apply.
50 posted on
05/18/2005 4:10:07 PM PDT by
LibertarianInExile
(<-- sick of faux-conservatives who want federal government intervention for 'conservative things.')
To: nosofar
I think he reck'd 'em....
70 posted on
05/18/2005 5:12:35 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Promote Conservative Judges NOW!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson