Posted on 05/22/2005 7:30:03 AM PDT by Dada Orwell
And that's why I don't fly - I won't jump through their hoops.
"The FSP helped turn NH from 'red' to 'blue'."
I think it was more of the "Massholes" migrating north that has turned NH purple.
Well, I hope he's ready to review the "Constutional Gaurantee for right to Air Travel" with the judge and jury when the time comes.
In addition, if it's an airline policy and not governmental policy he's already lost. Even if it's not airline policy, the government certainly has a right to expect reasonable oversight after 9/11. An ID simply isn't asking that much.
Bodily searches, OTOH, and I'll throw my share of stones...
Who said you needed govt permission to go anywhere?
You are still allowed to go anywhere you like- but if you want to go ON AN AIRLINE (or anyone elses transportation not owned by you) then they are perfectly within their rights in wanting to know exactly who you are.
I personally know of a number of people who voted DEMORAT as a response to the 'invasion' of Free Staters. Benson was attacked on talk radio a number of times because of his 'support' of the FSP (although the scandals swirling around him didn't help, either). There were a number articles in local newspapers discussing this phenomenon, as well. Of course, I don't consider newspapapers a terribly credible source. Natch, many of the DEMORATS came from Mass, as well.
It was the massholes with the help of MoveON who targeted NH because of the liberal same day voter registration laws without specific language vis a vis, identification which allowed Mass residents who owned seasonal property in NH to vote. Their vote in Mass was redundant so MoveOn could use these criminals to vote in a state not of their legal domicile. NH must change the registration and ID laws before 2006. I think it very unlikely however.
If ANY of the cops that had stopped Atta driving around the U.S. on an expired visa had checked on that, 3000 more people would be alive today.
We don't need to turn into a surveillance state to maintain security.
In fact, we fought a Cold War against a foe with hydrogen bombs, enough chem/bioweapons to kill everything on Earth, and an active program of infiltrating spies and saboteurs into the U.S. WITHOUT requiring ID to fly.
Wear your chains lightly.
I don't think he will succeed this time. Or, as Bud Grant once told Fran Tarkenton after the LA Rams had stuffed the Vikings running game in the first three possessions, "I don't think we can beat these people on the ground."
OK, so tell me when the Constitution was amended to enable the government to infringe on what was previously an absolute right.
I used to think the same way, but check the results. The southern tier (along I-93 & Route 3) was more Bush than Kerry. I would expect that those fleeing from MA would be more likely to settle in Hillsborough and Rockingham counties.
I hope the TSA does its homework, makes sure he's OK to fly before he shows up, and lets him on through. Then the TSA agents in Philly can turn him away. Ha ha! Enjoy your walk home, loser.
"Thousands of people were killed on 9/11 because of lax security at airports.
"
Wrong. Terrorists could still do the same thing today. This strip searching of grandma has done NOTHING to prevent another attack.
while you are being fondled by the TSA, there are illegals on the tarmac with no American loyalty servicing your aircraft. Anyone one of those people could aid a terrorist. Besides, a terrorist could go on the plane butt naked and still pull off a 9/11 if that cockpit door can be made to open.
Wow. Guess I need to change my bookmark to "www.SecureRepublic.com". Yeah, terrorists will sneak into the country, learn to fly aircraft, coordinate multiple simultaneous hijackings, but (unlike the Sept. 11th hijackers) will never figure out how to get a driver's license. < /s >
I would stress it this way: thousands were killed because we did not comprehend the nature of a suicide mission. Prior to 9/11, if a plane were hijacked, pilots and cabin crew were trained not to resist. The underlying assumption was that the hijacker wanted to live. Better to land the plane safely- no matter where than potentially causing a problem in flight.
9/11 changed that paradigm.
Yeah. What an idiot for actually believing the propaganda that this is a free country.
Freedom is now defined by statists as "free to obey the law or suffer the consequences".
By the same measure, Soviet peasants were "free" also.
Russell Kanning; Hope you enjoy jail food.
Now this Russell fellow is complaining about IDs yet I'd bet he'd be screaming his head off bor better airport security if there were another attack using that means. Dufusses like this are all alike.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.