Skip to comments.
Newsweek Retools Policies About Sources
Washington Post ^
| 5/22/05
| DESMOND BUTLER
Posted on 05/22/2005 6:49:40 PM PDT by Valin
NEW YORK -- Newsweek has adopted new policies for the use of anonymous sources, a week after retracting a report that claimed investigators had found evidence the Quran was desecrated by interrogators at the U.S. naval prison at Guantanamo Bay.
In a letter to readers appearing in Monday's edition, Newsweek Chairman and Editor-in-Chief Richard Smith apologized for the report and said the magazine will raise standards for anonymous sourcing.
We got an important story wrong, and honor requires us to admit our mistake and redouble our efforts to make sure that nothing like this ever happens again," he wrote.
Two of the magazine's top editors will be assigned sole responsibility for approving the use of anonymous sources, and the magazine will stop using the phrase "sources said" to attribute information in stories, Smith said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: journalism; korandesecration; newsweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
05/22/2005 6:49:40 PM PDT
by
Valin
To: Valin
Newsweek: America is dead (U.S. Flag Shown in Trashcan on Cover!)
Riding Sun Blog ^ | 5/23/2005 01:17:00 | GaijinBiker
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1408214/posts
Posted on 05/22/2005 1:12:32 PM CDT by FreedomCalls
Newsweek's false, retracted story about American guards flushing the Koran down a toilet at Guantanamo doesn't necessarily mean the magazine's staff hates America or Bush, or wants us to lose in Iraq. To be charitable, let's just chalk that one up to sloppy journalism.
(Click on link, stand by to get REALLY pissed)
2
posted on
05/22/2005 6:51:17 PM PDT
by
Valin
(The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.)
To: Valin
We've been "tooled" by Newsweek, now we gonna get "re-tooled".
Dontcha love it?
3
posted on
05/22/2005 6:52:13 PM PDT
by
YaYa123
(@How Bout "Just The Facts" For A Change?.com)
To: Valin
In a related story, housekeepers have decided to remodel the luxury suites on the Titanic.
To: YaYa123
"Newsweek has adopted new policies for the use of anonymous sources"I'll bet they are!
5
posted on
05/22/2005 6:53:47 PM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: Valin
CORRECTED HEADLINE:
MARXIST-ISLAMIST TOOL RETOOLS....
6
posted on
05/22/2005 6:54:12 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Valin
To: billorites
Yea, its the policy of lets just print it and apologize later after we've sold a million copies.
8
posted on
05/22/2005 6:55:47 PM PDT
by
TGOGary
(I would blow my brains out before ever wearing a blue beret.)
To: YaYa123
Gotta love a headline with "Newsweek" and "tool" in it.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
And the price of Fatback is at an all time low in Kentucky.
10
posted on
05/22/2005 6:57:21 PM PDT
by
TGOGary
(I would blow my brains out before ever wearing a blue beret.)
To: Blurblogger; YaYa123; billorites; Extremely Extreme Extremist; sgtbono2002; TGOGary; ...
11
posted on
05/22/2005 6:57:30 PM PDT
by
Valin
(The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.)
To: Valin
Jam it, Newsweek. I swear you're going down (legally).
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I'm doing what I can to spread this around
13
posted on
05/22/2005 7:00:52 PM PDT
by
Valin
(The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.)
To: Valin
this is the same problem that cbs and danny rather had--
fantasy vs reality.
what they wish to be true and what is true
are 2 different things.
14
posted on
05/22/2005 7:01:11 PM PDT
by
ken21
(if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
To: Valin
Newsweek Retools Policies About SourcesHow about just checking your sources instead of making crap up
15
posted on
05/22/2005 7:03:27 PM PDT
by
Popman
("I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it." Patrick Henry)
To: Valin
Since their source standards were substandard, how far will they raise them now? to mediocre? barely credible?
16
posted on
05/22/2005 7:05:52 PM PDT
by
commonasdirt
(Reading DU so you don't hafta)
To: Valin
I don't read Japanese, but I think I get the gist.
17
posted on
05/22/2005 7:09:51 PM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: Valin
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1408214/posts?page=17#17
THE 3 FACES OF NEWSWEEK
18
posted on
05/22/2005 7:20:14 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
To: Chgogal
19
posted on
05/22/2005 7:23:02 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
To: Valin
What kind of band of idiots would print an predictably inflammatory article from an "anonymous source"?
Oh yeah, I forgot, the same band of idiots that would print anything to discredit our President and the US Military. Accuracy be damned.
20
posted on
05/22/2005 7:23:41 PM PDT
by
stm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson