Creation Museum Sparks Evolution Debate

RedNova ^ | 22 May 2005 | Staff

[PatrickHenry]

Bold and underlining added by me. Everybody be nice.

[PatrickHenry]

EvolutionPing

A pro-evolution science list with over 280 names. See the list's description at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

[Non-Sequitur]

Two T-Rex on the ark, huh? Well that would probably explain why a lot of species became extinct.

[PatrickHenry]

Might as well get these links in early:
How to argue against a scientific theory.
The List-O-Links. Direct link to the right part of my homepage.

Another service of
Darwin Central
The conspiracy that cares

[Junior]

They'll spend $25 million dollars on this "museum" and then turn around and bitch that they can't get grant money to do their "research."

[sirchtruth]

"And so, I believe, is the age of the Earth," Storrs said. "It's very clear the Earth is much older than 6,000 years."

It is? By who's time?

Thanks for this PH. I appreciate you relating all aspects of the debate.

[Sam the Sham]

What debate ? Just because an astrology page is in every newspaper does not mean there is a learned 'debate' on its validity.

[LanPB01]

Oh, yeah. This is EXACTLY what we need in Kentucky. /sarcasm

[LanPB01]

"It's going to be a mini-Disney World"

Yeah, it's a Magic Kingdom, alright.

[PatrickHenry]

This is EXACTLY what we need in Kentucky.

Well, Florida has Kent Hovind's museum, in Pensacola. Gotta spread these things around. Oh, I found a Jack Chick link to Hovind: About Dr. Kent Hovind.

[DannyTN]

If Noah took T-Rex on the ark, they were probably babies.

However the way I read the flood account, I don't know that Noah necessarily took a pair of every land dwelling animal that was on earth prior to the flood. God caused the animals to come to Noah. And it's possible that God decided to leave some animals out. Since Genesis was written by Moses well after the flood, the reference to "every" animal, may mean every animal that we now have, as opposed to those that were in existence then.

[Drammach]

Considering the topic, even a HAM SANDWICH would start a debate..

[DannyTN]

Ping

[DannyTN]

What does Hovind have to do with an article about Ken Ham? It's a cheap attempt to discredit Ken Ham by association with Hovind. Not that Hovind rises to the level of fraudulence displayed by some past evolutionists.

Well while we are posting links to people who are completely irrelevant to the article. Here's some on Evolution fraudsters.

General Evolution Fraud Links

• 10 Notorious Darwinist Fabrications
• Anatomy of a Hoax by Sean Meek
• Dinosaur webcam pictures -- fake, hoax photos and pics
• Evolution Fraud in School Scienfic Textbooks
• Evolution fraud in current biology textbooks Worldnet Magazine 2001 Exposed as fakes decades ago, major publishers still include them
• Evolution Forgeries from the Muslim online book Evolution Deceit
• Gaps in the Textbooks' Coverage of the Fossil Record by Texans for Better Science Education
• Forensic geochemistry solves fossil riddles ..Geological Society News - New forensic tools developed to spot fossil fakes.
• Scientists behaving badly - Journal editors reveal researchers' wicked ways Nature 3/4/2004
• Survival of The Fakest Part I or Survival of The Fakest Part II by Jonathan Wells (PDF download)
• Textbook Fraud: Inherit The Wind is intellectual pornography!: Full of Lies, deception and very anti-Christian.
• Textbook Fraud: The Horse Series; Hyracotherium "dawn horse" eohippus, mesohippus, ...
• Text book Fraud! Video -& Documentation by Don Patton
• THE CASE OF ARCHAEOPTERYX The evidence strongly indicates it is a fake
  • Archaeopteryx (unlike Archaeoraptor) is NOT a hoax — it is a true bird, not a ‘missing link’ by Jonathan Sarfati
• The Rise of the Evolution Fraud  Review of book by Malcolm Bowden

[DannyTN]

"Another service of Darwin Central The conspiracy that cares"-Patrick Henry

"About what, I have no idea"

[From many - one.]

And I'll sit and wonder where that $25 million came from. Anyone know?

[nmh]

"John Marburger, the Bush administration's science adviser, has said, "Evolution is a cornerstone of modern biology."

Who cares!

He's wrong!

Ah liberals are sooooo intolerant. Unless YOU were there, you really don't know WHAT or HOW it happened - especially when evolutionists use FAULTY measuring and faulty theories ALL based on NO GOD. The initial premise of ALL evolution is that there is NO GOD.

[AntiGuv]

Among Ham's beliefs are that the Earth is about 6,000 years old, a figure arrived at by tracing the biblical genealogies, and not 4.5 billion years, as mainstream scientists say; the Grand Canyon was formed not by erosion over millions of years, but by floodwaters in a matter of days or weeks and that dinosaurs and man once coexisted, and dozens of the creatures - including Tyrannosaurus Rex - were passengers on the ark built by Noah, who was a real man, not a myth.

If this creation museum explains how Pepi I, the 2nd Pharaoh of the 6th Dynasty of Egypt who reigned in the time* of the alleged Flood, managed to not only survive said Flood but to not even notice it, then I'll go visit.

* As traced by biblical geneologies, of course..

[nmh]

"But he adds that he's careful to condemn the behavior, not the person. "

What's in a persons heart comes out through their behavior so the person is condemned. You can't separate the person from their behavior and I'm not talking about some disease like Parkinson's where a person shakes and can't help that.