[unbalanced but fair]

Well, there's always boycotting Coca Cola because their CEO is/was a donor to Bubba Clinton and Fat Teddy Kennedy's Campaigns. Then there's the fact that Coca Cola has a bottler in China.

And of course there's a whole list of companies like Progressive Insurance and Gateway Computers whose owners/CEOs are far Left Liberals and donate to all kinds of causes and campaigns most of us would despise. We can go on and on. Oh, and don't forget any company affiliated with George Soros.

Personally, I think boycotts only hurt the employees who do their job and may even disagree with the opinions of management. If sales go down, they're the ones to go first. CEOs always survive to work for someone else.

[schwing_wifey]

You know, you're perfectly right.

If only there was a sure-fire way to make the source of such nonsense pay instead of the working stiffs who are trying to make a living (instead of sucking off welfare).

At least the perp's "good name" is getting slammed on the "Net".