How you can conclude from any of this - even if it were accurate - that I think land possession/control is inappropriate is beyond me.
But it isn't accurate.
I said the two peoples can't coexist in one land.
I said the Arabs should have been expelled in '67 because - with hindsight - that seems to be the only time it could have been done.
Sharon is pulling back because he thinks the present borders can't be defended. I said I think that in the future Israel may be able to reconquer - because I don't think the Palestinians will be able to govern, or feed, themselves. When the place collapses into anarchy Israel may be able to take advantage of the situation. There's no way to determine whether it will be harder or easier. Too much depends on the assumptions being made.
The number of morons disagreeing with my analysis doesn't matter. What matters is the quality of the arguments.
I said Israel must pay very close attention to America's strategy. It cannot afford to alienate America - except in extremis...and in this I trust Sharon.
Make up your mind, pinhead
It's a matter of judgement...and in this I trust Sharon. Apparently that too is beyond your grasp.