...ALL DOPEY!
Posted on 05/24/2005 5:26:15 PM PDT by mdittmar
"We have sent President George Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and the radical right of the Republican party an undeniable message....the abuse of power will not be tolerated."
That was Democrat Minority Leader Harry Reid chortling over his party having once again put one over on the stupid party.
Seven so-called Republicans signed an idiot's compromise over the matter of judicial nominations, agreeing to defy the White House and their own leadership and for all intents and purposes give the Democrats a license to continue obstructing the approval of the president's judicial nominees.
Make no mistake about it this deal is nothing less than an abject surrender made more humiliating by its impudent demand that the President consult with the Senate BEFORE submitting his judicial nominations to the Senate.
According to the surrender document, "We encourage the Executive branch of government to consult with members of the Senate, both Democratic and Republican, prior to submitting a judicial nomination to the Senate for consideration."
In other words, in addition to shamefully legitimizing the Democrats' unprecedented use of the filibuster to prevent nominees from being given their constitutional right to be given an up-or-down vote, the deal attempts to rewrite the Constitution by seeking to meddle with the president's right to be the sole judge of whom he will nominate for judicial appointments.
If you listen to the seven deserters indulging in self-congratulation over their betrayal of the voters who made the GOP the majority party in the Senate, the deal was a victory for all Americans. But if you want to know who really won in this disgusting episode listen to Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, who boasted that her group was "heartened that the crisis has been averted and the right to filibuster preserved for upcoming Supreme Court nominations. We are confident that a Supreme Court nominee who won't even state a position on Roe v. Wade is the kind of 'extraordinary circumstance' this deal envisions."
Time and again the Senate's Democrat minority have demonstrated their willingness to employ the worst kind of skullduggery and outright lying and deception to obtain what they could not win from the voters, yet this gang of seven displayed a child's naiveté in accepting as valid the minority's trustworthiness and their promises to abide "upon mutual trust and confidence, related to pending and future judicial nominations in the 109th Congress."
Even more incomprehensible is the gang of seven's reliance on the Democrats' definition of the term "extraordinary circumstances," not spelled out in the surrender document, which states: "Signatories will exercise their responsibilities under the Advice and Consent Clause of the United States Constitution in good faith. Nominees should only be filibustered under extraordinary circumstances, and each signatory must use his or her own discretion and judgment in determining whether such circumstances exist."
In other words, they will rely on the duplicitous Democrats to decide what constitutes "extraordinary circumstances," which you can be certain they will define as relating to a nominee's stand on abortion and the legitimacy of liberal judicial activism supplanting the legislative process and the will of the voters as expressed at the polls. You might just as well post a sign on the door of the Senate chamber stating "No conservatives need apply."
The liberals' real target is the probability of Supreme Court vacancies and the administration's demonstrated tendency to nominate conservatives. By retaining the ability to filibuster, they plan to block any nominee to the high court who does not fit comfortably into the left-wing mold. Fortunately, the gang of seven was unable to surrender the ability of Senator Frist to employ the nuclear option should the Democrats attempt to deny the president's Supreme Court nominees their right to up-or-down votes.
Finally, the GOP's conservative majority needs to let the gang of seven know they will pay a very high price if they continue to play the Democrats' game.
its only a gang of 5..Snowe and Collins are too dumb to be counted a humans...on the other hand you were referring to senators and thus you're right..its 7
...ALL DOPEY!
The most crucial passage in the agreement may prove to be this one: "Each signatory must use his or her own discretion and judgment in determining whether such ['extraordinary'] circumstances exist." As a practical matter, this applies only to the Democratic signatories, since no Republican has ever voted to filibuster a Bush judicial nominee.The seven signatories, that is, have now declared that they will decide how to vote on judicial filibusters rather than take directions from the party. Two of them, Robert Byrd and Daniel Inoyue, probably did so largely to preserve "Senate tradition"; but the other five--Mary Landrieu, Joe Lieberman, Ben Nelson, Mark Pryor and Ken Salazar--are all generally moderate, and all from red states except Lieberman. Their inclinations and political interests diverge from those of Barbara Boxer, Ted Kennedy and other far-left blue-staters.
If left-wing Democrats want to filibuster another nominee, they will have to persuade Minority Leader Harry Reid to risk another nuclear confrontation and persuade at least one of the moderate compromising five, plus Byrd, Inoyue and every single uncompromising Dem, that it's worth it. It could happen, but we're not betting on it.
They think the gay marriage amendment brought out the conservative base, they haven't seen anything yet. There is a midterm election in 2006, I have a feeling the Democrats and these so-called "moderate" Republicans are going to be annihilated.
Meanie, Flakey, Whiney, Shakey, Queasy, Whimpy, and Lefty.
G*d Damn John McCain and all the others! If they want to be Democrats then switch damn parties and get the hell out of the GOP! Why do we get these turncoats like McCain, Graham, Voinovich, et al, who gladly do the Dems bidding???? I am so angry I could spit!!!!!
I think we all need to pull a Kerry and "sear" the names of these idiots into our brains because what goes around comes around. This bunch seem to be playing the dwarfs to Harry Reids' Snow White.
STFU, Dusty Harry, you effing hypocrite!
I think we all need to pull a Kerry and "sear" the names of these idiots into our brains because what goes around comes around.
Its the "flacid 7"
(cuz I can't say
Deeeee
ickless 7 here)
Just heard tim russert commenting on this,quoted the above quote,then said,"advice and consent",what a dumbass!
Why do I have the greatest urge to nail dingy Harry to the nearest wall...
Basically, they're saying "If you only nominate people we tell you to nominate, we will confirm your nominations".
Coming from those two, that's a compliment! Anyway, I'm in good company!
Incredible! Just like the Pubbies advised Clinton on his nominees, which is why, I suppose, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an idiot savant without the savants, sailed through her confirmation process!
He's obviously fogotten the messaage voters sent dashle.
Alas, this thought minimizes the treachery of the tergiversate seven. The 7, especially, McCain would vote against the simple majority option, arguing that they had agreed to a deal to avoid that disruption of the Senate.
Buffoon Bill Frist wouldn't get the 50 floor votes he needed to change the rules. That is the key victory of the scumbag crapweasel dems, there can be no rules change without the turncoats taking major heat from the dem leftie extremists. And, Buffoon Bill will not have the votes to end debate should-when the dems filibuster the next nominee. They'll give away Owen, Ford and Pryor (maybe!) and consider that the cost of, in effect, naming all future judges!
I'm with you. I think we need a support group or something so some of us dont go nuclear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.