Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS

Yes, most certainly they can do that BUT, what they have done is UNconstitutional. Period.

An agreement between 14 senators is NOT binding on the President. You can not amend the constitution this way.

But the democrats will act AS IF this is now what "advise and consent" means. Do you really think that the democrats won't do this? When has it ever meant that the President MUST talk and get their approval first for his nominees?


10 posted on 05/24/2005 8:38:25 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delenda est publius schola)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: TruthConquers

Well Linsey Graham and Saxby Chamblis tried to sue to have the Courts declare judicial filibusters unconstitutional. I don't think they won.


17 posted on 05/24/2005 8:56:18 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson