The point I was trying to make is that the anti-gun propaganda being taught in the schools is all many kids are ever going to hear, when they reach voting age they will run to the polls to vote for any gun grabber that promises to keep them safe from evil guns. You may not agree with teaching gun safety in the government shcools, but I belive it is necessary to counter the anti-gun propaganda in order to preserve RKBA for future generations.
Of course it is. But are the schools the ones we want to "counter the anti-gun propaganda"?
As I've said a dozen times, I see this as no different than sex ed. My question and my concern is: What will the schools be teaching? Why would anyone think it's a good thing to have the government getting involved in teaching our children about guns? These very same schools, as you yourself said, foster these attitudes about seizing guns. So why would you trust them to develop a responsible curriculum that will reinforce a knowledge of RKBA?
I saw nothing in this Fox story that suggests to me that there will be a pro-Second Amendment slant to this class.