Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Austin Willard Wright

What I am saying is The Pence approach will lead to a Bush veto.The Paul approach would have lead to increased spending and the killing of innocents.


12 posted on 05/25/2005 7:31:29 AM PDT by Gipper08 (MIKE PENCE IN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Gipper08
You haven't cleared it up. Are you saying that Pence "really" is against increased subsidies for stem cell research as such but voted the opposite way as part of a clever strategy to prevent subsidies for embryonic research? If so, could you provide a source in which explains his "true" views (that were not reflected by his clever vote)?

In the absence of such a source, the more logical explanation is that Pence's vote reflects his support for bigger government in stem cell research, rather than some sort of "hidden" strategy.

13 posted on 05/25/2005 7:38:26 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson