[MikefromOhio]

the problem? The same problem most conservatives have with NYT. it's called consider the source....


and every WND thread I see, I will call them worldnutdaily. they could say the sky is blue, but it would still call them that. Get used to it.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

RE: Get used to it.

Right. I will continue to provide facts as best I can. In this case the facts are the WND article is a legitimate news source.

Invective v. facts. I wonder how that will turn out?

What actually happened in OKC is still in dispute, however.

[CaptSkip]

I think you may be a TAD harsh in your criticism of WND.

They're not Debka.

And they do an excellent job of covering issues in great detail and with more apparent desire for accuracy and truth than say Newsweek, the NYTimes, and CBS.

A great example is WND's reporting on the Minutemen in Arizona. Excellent work leading to a congressional investigation of higher-ups in the US Border Patrol, who ordered a "stand-down" by border agents to minimize the success of the Minutemen Project.

The MSM turns their back on that kind of information.

Kinda the same way the FBI turned their back on all the eyewitnesses here in OKC of active participation by Middle Eastern Terrorists.

That information didn't neatly fit Klinton/Reno's required conclusion of domestic right-wing nut-jobs egged on by Rush's hate speech.