Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The American Right Must Get Off The Pot on Israel, War, and Draft
Al-Jazeerah ^ | 5-26-05 | Mark Dankof

Posted on 05/25/2005 7:59:44 PM PDT by SJackson

It is time to give laudatory kudos to The Council on the National Interest (CNI) for doing what virtually no one else has had the guts to do in contemporary America: challenging the Jewish lobby in America, specifically the American Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC). CNI is specifically charging AIPAC with what is specifically provable and obvious: that the latter is a foreign lobby which is in the business of influencing (read "purchasing") the American government for purposes solely related to driving American domestic and foreign policy in a direction designed to benefit the government of Israel--to the exclusion of everything and everyone else.

Pat Buchanan once drew the ire of the Jewish-dominated American Media Establishment for referring to Washington's Capitol Hill as "Zionist Occupied Territory" (ZOA). If ever there was proof of the truth of Mr. Buchanan's charge, it came tonight in the form of the deliberate absence of major American network coverage of the anti-AIPAC protest sponsored by CNI, which had its genesis at the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and 7th street in the District. The denizens of ABC, NBC, and CBS apparently deemed the issue of parental notification of minors seeking abortion--and the government-subsidized Viagra distributions to sexually predatory felons--to be more newsworthy than whether or not the National Government of the American People is owned lock-stock-and-barrel by a foreign country. One so grateful for the $5 billion a year in direct foreign aid subsidies received from the United States, that it regularly operates a spy ring to steal state secrets from its major benefactor. Move over Jonathan Pollard. Make room for accused AIPAC spies, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman.

Mr. Rosen was AIPAC's policy director; Mr. Weissman was, conveniently enough, AIPAC's senior analyst on Iran. Their American contact, Mr. Larry Franklin, was a National Security Agency analyst with a specialty in matters Iranian and connections to the policy big wigs on the Neo-Conservative Right who reportedly find preemptive war with Iran to be the next major project to be undertaken by the American government and the Likudniks who permeate its National Security Establishment. Howard Kohr, AIPAC's Executive Director, fired these Kosher Benedict Arnolds only upon the advice of Nathan Lewin, the lawyer retained by AIPAC to deal with the FBI espionage investigation. It seems Mr. Lewin has more than a pretty good idea that federal indictments against Rosen and Weissman are just around the proverbial corner.

So what is the response of the United States government to this latest spy debacle involving Israel? To do, of course, what any sovereign government would do under the circumstances: send the Secretary of State of the United States, Condolezza Rice, along with senior members of the United States Congress from both major parties, to an AIPAC-sponsored event tonight in downtown Washington. The immediate purpose was to have dinner with the ultimate handler of all of these targeted espionage operations--the Prime Minister of Israel himself, Ariel Sharon. The National Chairmen of both the Republican and Democratic Parties were in attendance as well. And AIPAC proudly observed in the May 19th Washington Post that "half the Senate and a third of the House" would be present for this culinary event of luminaries in Belshazzar's court. It was an event clearly drenched in both greenbacks, shekels, and irony, all largely unappreciated by an American public dependent upon an Israel-First Inside-the-Beltway media. The latter effectively turned the dinner lights conveniently down low--to enshroud this gathering in the subterranean darkness of the Nation's Capitol. Why not turn the lights on? Apparently because the idea was to allow all of the participants to fly in under radar. While it worked this evening, it will not work much longer.

Ex-Director of Central Intelligence, Allen Dulles, once warned against "the slips that give away the whole show" in covert operations and intelligence gathering in the secret world. It may not be an accident that the Bush Administration commissioned the First Lady's PR trip to the Middle East this week to achieve public diversion from the presence of Sharon in New York yesterday and Washington today, along with the AIPAC espionage investigation and the presence of official Washingtondom at tonight's AIPAC dinner. It may also be less than a coincidence that the BBC journalists' strike of 24 hours duration in the UK was timed to match the time frame of the gala for the rotund PM of the Jewish State this evening in Babylon-By-The-Potomac. And, as is often the case with the Corporate Media, what is uncovered and unspoken is often more significant than what is. This is definitely the case for May 23, 2005 in the Nation's Capitol.

The bad news for the AIPAC operatives and the denizens of Zionist Occupied Territory, however, is this. Thanks to the Council for the National Interest, the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA), the work of libertarian-oriented human rights activist Carol Moore, and a host of other groups and individuals across the political spectrum associated with the anti-AIPAC protest in Washington, average Americans are beginning to learn the darker truths about the Zionist lobby and its symbiotic relationship with the American Empire. The thievery of the land of 750,000 Palestinians in 1948; the exterminations at Deir Yassin; the role of Begin, Shamir, and the Stern Gang in bombing the King David Hotel in Jerusalem; the murder of Count Bernadotte of Sweden; and years of false-flag covert operations designed to maintain Allen Dulles's dictum of secrecy in covert operations "from inception to eternity," have not impeded the beginning of the "showing of the slip."

This is especially true in the wake of the fraudulent case presented by Bush and Blair for the war of preemption, occupation, and counterinsurgency in Iraq. It is no accident that the perpetrators of this never-ending tragedy are all policy makers with provable political and money trails that lead back to Tel Aviv. The same is true for the war against Syria and Iran that is brewing in the pot at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Capitol South, the Pentagon, and Langley. The patience of the American public is beginning to fray in the wake of the expenditure of $200 billion, the loss of almost 2,000 American lives, and the killing of 100,000 Iraqis in merely the latest phase of what began with Bush I in 1991. If the failure of American policy in Iraq, a nation of 26 million people, is indicative of future problems in the region, one may ask how 70 million Iranians will be effectively subdued in a nation with three times the land mass of its Mesopotamian neighbors--and possessive of a proud nationalism and fervent Shiism that will add Mexican salsa and Texan BBQ sauce to the explosive mix that is in the midst of reaching 212.9 degrees Fahrenheit.

And the world will note that any American military preemption against Iran will be undertaken in alliance with the Middle East's chief nuclear, chemical, and biological power--Israel--a non-signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) allegedly held in high esteem by Washington--unless it involves accountability for the Jewish State. And what if Americans are ever told the truth about Israeli intelligence operations with Communist China that have injured American interests from time to time, especially the joint purloining of nuclear secrets at Los Alamos in the PROMIS affair? Dying for Eretz Yisrael in an American uniform will begin to look less attractive by the atomic second.

There is one more ominous sign for Sharon, Bush, and the Boys in both Washington and Tel Aviv. Dissension against an Israel-First foreign policy in the United States is beginning to involve not only independent voices of moral concern on the left and among independent voters, but within a resurgent Old American Right as well. It is presently lost to the New York Times and the Washington Post that the real American Right has no use for Zionism and the domestic Jewish lobby in America whatsoever, any more than it espouses the statism of a powerful Federal government and allegiance to the institutions of the New World Order (NWO). This burgeoning, brewing dissent has not yet come to the explosive surface, but it will--when military conscription is re-instituted in the United States to claim the lives and blood of more of the nation's young people in the service, not of America, but of Zionism and the State of Israel. John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Ralph Reed, and the other denizens of a Christian Right leadership owned by handlers in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, will be thrown overboard along with their Neo-Conservative allies in the National Security State and Republican Party Establishments in Washington, replaced by a grass-roots prairie-fire on the Right--sick of foreign war, unrestrained illegal immigration, exploding national debt, the outsourcing of the manufacturing sector of the American economy, a malignant popular culture, and a domestic police state.

The chief sign of this is the creation of the new Mothers Against the Draft, involving long-time conservative activists Janine Hansen of Utah and Debbie Hopper of St. Louis, Missouri. It is not in the game plan of these women--or their burgeoning support base around the country--to lose children and grand-children to the policy-menu served by AIPAC and Ariel Sharon to official Washington tonight. And these determined patriotic Americans will not lose.

Council for the National Interest--meet Mothers Against the Draft!!!!!

That marriage will symbolize the end of AIPAC, the destruction of the American Empire, and the re-establishment of the American Constitutional Republic.

And how do the rest of us help? Start with the worldwide Internet dissemination of CNI's full page ad running in tomorrow's New York Times and Washington Post. Then begin worldwide Net distribution of the URL for Mothers Against the Draft. These initial acts can be the beginning of a new clarion call in the night for freedom, and the victory of good over evil. Support these unarmed volunteers with time and money. The clock is ticking. The hour is late. And nothing less than victory will do in the war that really matters.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: dankof; markdankof; toxicwaste
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2005 7:59:44 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

Al-Jazeerah has the best headlines!

2 posted on 05/25/2005 8:00:42 PM PDT by SJackson (I don't think the red-tiled roofs are as sturdy as my asbestos one, Palestinian refugee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Where's Barf Alert?


3 posted on 05/25/2005 8:02:02 PM PDT by gogipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gogipper
Where's Barf Alert?

The author is a Constitutional Party Senate candidate. I didn't want to offend anyone, so let Al-Jazeerah speak for itself.

4 posted on 05/25/2005 8:07:04 PM PDT by SJackson (I don't think the red-tiled roofs are as sturdy as my asbestos one, Palestinian refugee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
What's your intent posting this? Your commentary doesn't make your purpose clear. Writing, "Al-Jazeerah has the best headlines!" can be construed a number of ways. Sarcasm would be nice. Here's hoping.
5 posted on 05/25/2005 8:09:50 PM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Paleocons are uniting with Al Jazeera eh? Sigh.


6 posted on 05/25/2005 8:10:40 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gogipper; SJackson; general_re; aculeus; hellinahandcart; Thinkin' Gal; Constitution Day; ...
Where's Barf Alert?

The name Mark Dankof should suffice.

(General, I'm sobbin' over this broken graphic link! Your text is still a classic.)

7 posted on 05/25/2005 8:11:26 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

I think the article is hysterical. There's nothing wrong with seeing what a large chunk of the world reads about America. And unless there are two Mark Dankof's of similar mindset, the man's a former Senate candidate. For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there.


8 posted on 05/25/2005 8:13:46 PM PDT by SJackson (I don't think the red-tiled roofs are as sturdy as my asbestos one, Palestinian refugee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dighton

The Mark of Zorro should suffice....


9 posted on 05/25/2005 8:14:51 PM PDT by gogipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dighton
The name Mark Dankof should suffice.

Maybe he thought they'd only publish it in arabic.

10 posted on 05/25/2005 8:17:26 PM PDT by SJackson (I don't think the red-tiled roofs are as sturdy as my asbestos one, Palestinian refugee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

"One so grateful for the $5 billion a year in direct foreign aid subsidies received from the United States..."




While I'm not thrilled with any of this foreign aid...I wonder if the author has added up exactly how much it is that the Palestinians, Egyptians, Saudis, Turkey, etc, also receive from the US in aid. Hell, we are still paying for Camp David despite efforts from some in Egypt to destroy Israel.


11 posted on 05/25/2005 8:17:34 PM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwb
While I'm not thrilled with any of this foreign aid...I wonder if the author has added up exactly how much it is that the Palestinians, Egyptians, Saudis, Turkey, etc, also receive from the US in aid. Hell, we are still paying for Camp David despite efforts from some in Egypt to destroy Israel.

Israel doesn't get $5 billion, and no, he hasn't added it up because he doesn't care about foreign aid, he cares about Israel.

12 posted on 05/25/2005 8:18:58 PM PDT by SJackson (I don't think the red-tiled roofs are as sturdy as my asbestos one, Palestinian refugee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
You wrote, "For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there."

What's out there is what is commonly called the fringe, the political no-man's-land where anti-semites use creepy little code words like 'Jewish Lobby' to connote something older and darker. Lending credence to a man like Dankof because he's a 'former Senate candidate' is a kind of logical misdirection, a false attribution of qualities normally associated with men and women of real stature and merit. Should I take whackjobs like Lyndon LaRouche seriously because he's a former presidential candidate? That's the rationale you're selling and I, for one, am not buying it. Keep the bigotry off the board.
13 posted on 05/25/2005 8:29:39 PM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan
You wrote, "For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there." What's out there is what is commonly called the fringe, the political no-man's-land where anti-semites use creepy little code words like 'Jewish Lobby' to connote something older and darker. Lending credence to a man like Dankof because he's a 'former Senate candidate' is a kind of logical misdirection, a false attribution of qualities normally associated with men and women of real stature and merit. Should I take whackjobs like Lyndon LaRouche seriously because he's a former presidential candidate? That's the rationale you're selling and I, for one, am not buying it. Keep the bigotry off the board.

If you feel the Constitution Party and their candidates are bigots and have no place being mentioned on FR, I'm the wrong one to complain to. I'd suggest you bring their bigotry up when they're mentioned as an option, rather than when it's exposed.

14 posted on 05/25/2005 8:35:29 PM PDT by SJackson (I don't think the red-tiled roofs are as sturdy as my asbestos one, Palestinian refugee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: All
For anyone who enjoys poking around in toxic waste dumps, put on your hazmat suit and go here.
16 posted on 05/25/2005 8:39:36 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This SOB was a Constitution Party nominee for the Senate, and wrote for the Missouri Lutheran Synod.
Dankof is also one of the Dhimmi turning Libertypost.org into a anti-Jewish zone.




Dankof may oppose Muslim immigration, but he is still
a useful idiot for the Islamists. He writes for
Islamic Media (Iran Dokht, Al Bawaba, Nile Media, Al
Jazeerah) attacking the US, neoconservatives, and
Zionists.
http://www.markdankof.com/eckstein_reed.htm
http://www.markdankof.com/op-ed01.htm

Dankof sees Zionist Jews as having corrupted
Christians:
http://www.markdankof.com/trinity_mammon_zionism.htm
http://www.markdankof.com/family_values.htm
http://www.markdankof.com/dispensationalism.htm
http://www.lmsusa.org/tt-08-01.htm

Finally, there is an article where Dankof approves of
a book that supposedly shows the nexus between the
Mossad, Chinese intelligence, and Islamist terrorism
in controlling the US.
http://www.markdankof.com/seeds_of_fire.htm

Reading through Dankof's articles
(http://www.markdankof.com/articles.htm), it is clear
to me that this man is on a mission to tie Orthodox
Lutherans, American Nationalists, and Islamist
apologist together in a struggle against anyone who
would stand against Islamism.

Bush may be an idiot, but Dankof is evil. It is
unfortunate that the Constitution Party is tied to a
person like this.

Ron


17 posted on 05/25/2005 8:41:53 PM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It isn't for me to say who or what may or may not be posted here, and that isn't my point or purpose. You post a thinly veiled piece of antisemitic tripe attributed to one of those obscure third-party mouthpieces, and do so for reasons open to the widest possible interpretation: to show alternatives to the Republican Party. How about you personally? Where do you stand? Do you think these people represent a viable alternative? Do you agree with their stance concerning the 'Jewish Lobby'? Straight answers would be nice.
18 posted on 05/25/2005 8:49:32 PM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan; SJackson
SJackson wrote:

If you feel the Constitution Party and their candidates are bigots and have no place being mentioned on FR, I'm the wrong one to complain to. I'd suggest you bring their bigotry up when they're mentioned as an option, rather than when it's exposed.

Rembrandt_fan then wrote:

yada yada yada ending with Do you agree with their stance concerning the 'Jewish Lobby'? Straight answers would be nice.

Seems PRETTY. FRICKEN. OBVIOUS. what to me what SJackson is saying. The article is idiocy written by an idiot who is a member of a political party that is idiotic.

You are trying to debate a poster who completely agrees with you, and made it clear enough that even a child would understand. What do you do in your spare time, interrogate your houseplants?
19 posted on 05/25/2005 9:40:33 PM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Wow, I'm shocked! Al Jazeera is saying that Jews are bad, Jews control Congress, etc...

Shocked, I say. And deeply saddened.

Mark


20 posted on 05/25/2005 9:44:15 PM PDT by MarkL (I've got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson