Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Filibuster 'Compromise': America Betrayed - (Chris Adamo just about says it all here!)
CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | MAY 26, 2005 | CHRISTOPHER ADAMO

Posted on 05/25/2005 8:56:35 PM PDT by CHARLITE

It will be some time before the full impact of this week’s sellout by seven so-called “moderate” Republicans in the U.S. Senate becomes completely apparent. The plan to break Democrat filibusters of judicial nominees was, in reality, no less than a Republican fight to restore the integrity of the Constitution. But in the face of the Republican defections, Democrats will now credibly claim to have protected it, and the nation as a whole, from the ravages of Republican “extremism.”

Despite media spin, this arrangement was no agreement among “centrists” from both parties. The seven Democrats who participated in the deal acted as devoted foot soldiers for Senate Minority leader Harry Reid, loyally doing his bidding.

In contrast, the seven Republican participants knowingly betrayed their own party’s leadership.

Were Newsweek magazine to objectively cover the event, it might show them flushing a U.S. Constitution down the toilet.

In return for their complete abandonment of efforts to restore constitutional integrity to the judiciary, Republicans essentially got nothing. The “concession” by Democrats to “allow” (Any doubts as to who is in control?) floor votes on nominees Brown, Owen, and Pryor, amounts to little more than the worst sort of tokenism.

Furthermore, Democrat promises to only revert to judicial filibusters under “extraordinary circumstances” are an insult to the intelligence of any cognizant Republican (of which there are admittedly few).

Democrats have already shown the degree to which they can torture new meanings out of such straightforward terms as “is” and “sex.” In their minds, the traditional values of mainstream America already easily exceed the boundaries of “extraordinary.”

In truth, Monday’s surrender was only the latest in a long series of such capitulations by Republicans at critical moments in the country’s political discourse.

Former Senator Bob Dole (R.-KS) ushered in the present era of GOP backtracking when he uttered his famous “enough is enough” retreat on the budget battle of 1995, unconditionally surrendering to Bill Clinton.

Far worse was the manner in which Republicans, including several real conservatives, abandoned their core principles and rallied to the side of ultra-liberal New Jersey Governor Christine Whitman in her razor-thin 1997 re-election bid. Coming to her aid to a degree rarely displayed in any gubernatorial race, Republican and conservative leaders essentially told the entire “moderate” (read: liberal) wing of the party that it can always expect blind loyalty from the right.

Whitman repaid conservatives four years later by siding with liberals at a crucial point in the campaign of her potential successor, Bret Schundler, helping secure victory for his Democrat opponent, Jim McGreevey. But were her actions really contrary to her well known ultra-liberal political and moral philosophies?

Last year, President Bush helped set the stage for the sellout of his own judicial nominees by aiding one of the Republican Party’s most contemptible Senate “Trojan horses,” Pennsylvania “moderate” Arlen Specter. By his actions, the President clearly made a statement that no matter how antithetical to conservatism Republican office holders might be, in a pinch they can count on conservative support.

Though Specter did not directly participate in the “compromise agreement” devised by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, his vocal endorsement of such efforts certainly emboldened those Republicans who did.

So, should anyone be surprised when “moderates” fearlessly undermine valiant conservative efforts such as Senate Majority leader Bill Frist’s fight to restore a constitutional judiciary? What has the party leadership, and indeed the President himself, ever shown them they might have to lose by such duplicity?

The only glimmer of light at the end of this dismal tunnel is that conservatives may have finally awakened to the fact that, by their consistent support of traitors in their midst, they have helped degenerate the situation to its present state. This approach to achieving “majority” status has been an utter disaster. Thus, a change in political strategy is the first step towards rectifying the situation.

Three Senate Republicans who engaged in this week’s treachery, Olympia Snowe of Maine, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, and Mike Dewine of Ohio, are up for reelection next year. Conservative activists should immediately begin to organize efforts to see them defeated by any candidate who runs against them.

Conservatives had better come to grips with the fact that fifty-two real Republican Senators would constitute a better majority than fifty-five who think they can engage in such disloyalty with impunity. Otherwise, they must resign themselves to the grim prospect that such people do indeed run the country.

About the Writer: Christopher Adamo is a freelance writer from southeastern Wyoming, where he has been involved in grassroots political activites for several years. He maintains a website at http://www.chrisadamo.com. Christopher receives e-mail at adamo.chronwatch@lycos.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: betrayal; betrayed; bush; compromisers; constitutional; filibuster; fourteen; johnmccain; option; republicans; rinos; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
QUOTE OF THE DAY

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same."

Ronald Reagan


1 posted on 05/25/2005 8:56:35 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Appreciate the fellow's sentiment, but he makes the mistake of believing that the GOP and the DEMS didn't want the compromise.

Repeating my prior post:

Most still don’t get it. I suggested, when all was said and done, we would find out who were the real culprits.

With Frists’speech tonight, where he acknowledged the viability of "extraordinary circumstances", he tipped his hand. We now know the real culprit was the Senate as a whole. It basically appointed a committee of 14. While the rest of the Senators entertained and kept their bases preoccupied on CSPAN, the committee was at work finding a negotiated settlement.

Have you heard ONE GOP senator, call for retribution against the Rino’s. Have you heard GWB scream out in righteous indignation. No, and we never will.

The majority GOP appease their base by saying the nuclear option still exists; the DEMS appease their base by saving they saved the Republic. Meanwhile, just as Terri Schiavo, we sheeple got hung out to dry.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...we got fooled again.
2 posted on 05/25/2005 9:07:53 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Thank you for posting this- I think that these seven traitors have totally screwed the Republican Party, and the country. But if Frist is right, and we do retain the Constitutional/ nuclear option, then we are no worse off, and have essentially lost nothing.
3 posted on 05/25/2005 9:09:25 PM PDT by de Buillion (Thank God for GWB, Ann Coulter, and PARIS HILTON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

Yep..........The best part is, people still BELIEVE IN their side. Without that rhetoric and partisanship that keeps people sending in the money, the politicians would have to find honest work.


4 posted on 05/25/2005 9:11:30 PM PDT by jeremiah (Is it not treason, to allow the flow of illegals to be unchecked?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

You're dead wrong and yes, I have heard several GOP Senators, calmly having a fit over this; Frist included.


5 posted on 05/25/2005 9:13:10 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion

You're 1/2 right but very wrong about us not having lost anything.


6 posted on 05/25/2005 9:14:08 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jeremiah
Without that rhetoric and partisanship that keeps people sending in the money, the politicians would have to find honest work.


Jeremiah, you got them a good one! :)

I mean, if the GOP leadership was for real, they would be trying to destroy this coalition. You get Dewine and Snow in a room, and you tell them, "look, you come our way. If not, you won't be a Senator after 2006. We will run someone against you, and even if we lose, we'll actively support that person as a 3rd party candidate and use all our resources to make certain you lose in the general election. You're history. "

But, of course, this will never happen. Rino's give the GOP cover to maintain the "comity" in the gentleman's club known as the Senate of the United States.
7 posted on 05/25/2005 9:21:58 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
You're dead wrong and yes, I have heard several GOP Senators, calmly having a fit over this; Frist included.


Really? And what has Frist done about it No Pardons, except admit tonight that the DENMS can filibuster under extraordinary circumstances.

Do you think Tip O'Neill, George Mitchell, Sam Rayburn, LBJ- would have made that speech tonight. I don't think so. They would have been to busy smashing the traitors, but good. IMO, of course. :)
8 posted on 05/25/2005 9:27:16 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
Frist is a LOUSY Majority Leader and I've been saying that he had NO business being one, since the Lott debacle.

But you claimed that NO GOP Senator has complained about the gang of 7 and that is dead wrong; they have.

9 posted on 05/25/2005 9:31:35 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

When the RATS have the 55-45 majority business WILL NOT be done in this manner. Count on it!


10 posted on 05/25/2005 9:34:25 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

But you claimed that NO GOP Senator has complained about the gang of 7 and that is dead wrong; they have.



With respect, no pardons, I think you're misquoting me. I didn't say that no GOP senator objected, I said no GOP has sought retribution. Big difference, I think. :)


11 posted on 05/25/2005 9:45:02 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
Okay, go pic nits......

You don't know what's being done in private. And no, neither do I. But since I HAVE heard Frist and a few GOP Senators talk about the situation, you can't assume what you're assuming. This kind of stuff goes on behind closed doors!

12 posted on 05/25/2005 9:53:42 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; sirthomasthemore
But you claimed that NO GOP Senator has complained about the gang of 7 and that is dead wrong; they have.

What sirthomas said was that no GOP Senator had "called for retribution" against the RINO's. That is not at all the same thing.

Complaining is irrelevant, futile and completely worthless. What is required is publicly calling for and then mounting an effort to actually make these renegade Senators suffer some consequences for their actions.

13 posted on 05/25/2005 9:55:33 PM PDT by tarheelswamprat (This tagline space for rent - cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
I said no GOP has sought retribution. Big difference, I think. :)

correct. For failing to stop this pervasion of the Constitution by McCommunist and his traitors, Frist should resign. This incident illustrates that Frist doesn't have the Warrior/Killer instinct needed to defeat the vile and evil Democrats. The very survival of our Republic is in the balance and all the 14 POS can do is talk about "protecting the institution" and other such utterly useless blathering. The judiciary needs to be reigned in or another revolution will happen within a generation.

14 posted on 05/25/2005 10:00:11 PM PDT by liberty2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat; liberty2004
Thanks, for support- but no pardon thinks that you guys are "picking nits" :0)

(I'd rather you 2 take the criticism, than me) :)
15 posted on 05/25/2005 10:06:10 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat
That is NEVER done publicly; NEVER.

It's done quietly and in private. People just stop talking to the pariah/s, they get no help if the have a Bill coming to the floor, etc.

16 posted on 05/25/2005 10:06:56 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion

Okay, somebody tell me what the difference is between john mccain and john kerry. Okay both were "guests" of the North Vietnamese, mccain for a number of years in hanoi, and kerry for a few days in Paris. Both served in the Navy (all right, mccains original discharge was honorable), but they both got discharges from the navy. So what is the difference?????


17 posted on 05/25/2005 10:23:42 PM PDT by stumpy (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
"You're 1/2 right but very wrong about us not having lost anything. "

OK, I'll bite. Sen. Frist says he still has the nuclear option, so what have we lost?

18 posted on 05/25/2005 10:35:29 PM PDT by de Buillion (Thank God for GWB, Ann Coulter, and PARIS HILTON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stumpy
"Okay, somebody tell me what the difference is between john mccain and john kerry. "

Glad you asked! The main difference is this- Johm McCain is a certified US military Hero, but to his discredit, a rino, and John F'ing Kerry is a certified TRAITOR to the USA, who by all accounts was DISHONORABLY DISCHARGED from the US NAVY.

19 posted on 05/25/2005 10:44:24 PM PDT by de Buillion (Thank God for GWB, Ann Coulter, and PARIS HILTON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion
We lost the momentum, we lost ending this right here and now, we lost the PR game, Frist lost control, we lost an up or down vote on the rest of the stalled judicial nominees, who are now in limbo,and when Frist tries to use the nuclear option, he'll be smeared and probably lose. And that's just for starters.

You really haven't been paying all that much attention to this , or you'd know all of that.

20 posted on 05/25/2005 11:19:36 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson