This judge, in effect, is telling the government to simply ignore these international rules we've agreed to.
Yep. It seems the anti-American ACLU and this liberal judge want as much American bloodshed as they can get.
If it isn't deadly - it isn't liberal enough.
This is designed exclusively to whip up international outcry and
turn Americans against GWB and the war. The public knows there were instances of abuse, but with these pics will come the insinuation that the abuse was both widespread and common.
We are at war. The media and the ACLU do not have a need to know every detail and be present for every little thing. This is part and parcel of Amnesty Int. trying to bring charges against GWB, Rumsfeld and who knows who else.
vaudine
Really! What are the military trials for then?
Seriously.
Though those held at Abu Ghraib weren't POW's their detainment could possibly cause them to fall under the Geneva conventions unlike regular terrorists.
In a normal abuse case if someone took pictures of the torture they commited then the pictures are kept from public. But in this case we have to release photos of the victims... and the only reason why is to throw disrepute on the US.
So now we have Judge Hellerstein ruling that the US is NOT subject to the Geneva Conventions!
If there weren't lives at stake, these judges would hilarious. Hilarious Hellerstein, Professional Pretzel Maker.
Why do we have to obey international law? We set international law.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/10/26/noniraqi.prisoners/
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Non-Iraqi prisoners captured by U.S. forces on the Iraq battlefield are not entitled to the protections afforded by the Geneva Conventions, according to a recent legal opinion from the Justice Department.