You support her position on taxes, social security reform, border control, medicaid reform, funding for the NEA, tort reform and expansion of government?
Absent knowing what her position on those and another three dozen issues I think I'll hold back, thanks.
This is in fact the only rational position for a president to adopt, given that it is the only alternate position that has a ghost of a chance of replacing Roe. EO's about abortion in the military, foreign aid, etc, are good, but mainly serve as moral statements. They probably save few lives.
Encouraging courts to throw the issue back to the States, where it belongs, is the best thing a President realistically can do for Life.
I wish GW had taken this position and held to it from the start. His argument about changing hearts is a long term recipe for healing, but it doesn't move the ball at all. The federalist option as you call it, is principled, politically viable, and based on a sound understanding of the founders' intentions.