Ohh not that kind of grass? My bad :)
Posted on 5/30/2005, 3:45:01 PM by aculeus
Britain's first major electricity plant to be fuelled by grass will begin construction later this year.
The £6.5m power station in Staffordshire will be burn locally cultivated elephant grass and will be able to supply 2,000 homes with electricity.
Amanda Gray, director of Eccleshall Biomass, the company behind the power station, said the project was of major importance to rural industry in Staffordshire and offered another way to meet the UK's obligation to reduce carbon emissions, because burning the elephant grass will only release the carbon dioxide that the plants soaked up anyway while they were growing.
The plant could be a key element in the quest to tackle climate change. With only 1% of the world's population, the UK produces 3% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions.
Power stations are a major factor, pumping out around a third of the total carbon dioxide produced by the UK. The government wants to reduce the country's carbon emissions by 60% by 2050 and wants renewable energy, such as wind, waves and biomass, to play a key part.
Around 170 farmers are now diversifying into growing the energy crop to feed the two megawatt steam-turbine generator at the Raleigh Hall industrial estate, in Eccleshall, near Stafford.
The local regional development agency, Advantage West Midlands (AWM), has also got in on the act by approving a £935,000 grant to help pay for the power station.
A spokesman for AWM said agricultural activities accounted for nearly 75% of land use in the region and the plant would play a vital role in regenerating the rural areas and enabling farmers to diversify.
The plant would operate for 8,000 hours a year on a 24-hour basis and save one tonne per hour of carbon dioxide, which would otherwise have been emitted using fossil fuels to generate electricity.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2005
Ha, ha, ha! What ridiculous logic... and a waste of money.
Dude! Like Wow!
NeverGore :^)
SAVE THE GRASS FROM CAPITALIST PIGS!!!
I don't know how efficiently those would burn or what the pollutive byproducts would be, but it strikes me as a better solution than dumping valuable fuelstuffs into the ground.
Too easy.
Let's see, capital expenditure of US$11,000,000 / 8,000 hrs/yr = US$1,375 per tonne of carbon.
Yes the plant will last more than a year, and yes the cost of power produced (less cost of fuel) must be considered.
Doesn't this seem like a tremendous waste of money, if the goal is to provide a more efficient means of living (productivity) verses yet another hidden tax on citizens?
The local regional development agency, Advantage West Midlands (AWM), has also got in on the act by approving a £935,000 grant to help pay for the power station.
In my area, this means that local taxes were spent to foster this development.
If West Midlands needs a local source of power, I'm OK with it. If this is just another payoff to line the pockets of enviro-wienies, it's a waste.
There's a large plant here in New Hampshire, in the town of Jaffrey, that uses sawdust to produce pellet fuel for pellet stoves:
http://www.theunionleader.com/Articles_show.html?article=54463&archive=1
Part of their mix is green sawdust which they dry in kilns heated by pellet fuel.
In earlier times, Americans burned the leavings of herbivores for cooking and warmth, letting the animals "pre-process" the grass, so to speak. I wonder if Eccleshall Biomass has considered bringing in some elephants...
I wonder how much energy they use...?
On the right track, but not far enough.
Good old father erf does it for us much better with an endless replenishing supply of coal & crude.
The Deep Hot Bio-Sphere
Thomas Gold
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.