Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Remember_Salamis
Well put. Some people may argue that there would be no difference in the state of affairs if it were repealed but your point is just one of the many cleansing effects that would prevail. More money hungry senators would be at the mercy of the states, essentially eliminating lobbyists from the senate. Maybe the power structure would be reversed from that of a collective union of states to that of one that champions states rights over federal govt rights. Perhaps its a dream but with enough committed individuals, anything can happen.
115 posted on 05/30/2005 9:46:54 PM PDT by IronChefSakai (Life, Liberty, and Limited Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: IronChefSakai

Another issue is the concentration of lobbyists. Under the 17th, all of the lobbyists are concetrated in one area: Washington. If it was repealed, they would be spread out among the 50 state capitals. This would make their lobbying efforts more difficult at a minimum.


116 posted on 05/30/2005 9:58:42 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson